Kishor Dattu Gaikwad vs The Chairman/Secretary, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Mahatma Phule Trust Advocate - S M Sansare — 17/2025
Case under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools 1977 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--BY TRANSFER on 17th March 2026.
Misc. Application
CNR: MHSS120000382025
Filing Number
40/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Court
School Tribunal, Pune
Judge
1-Presiding Officer
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BY TRANSFER
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kishor Dattu Gaikwad
Adv. P S Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chairman/Secretary, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Mahatma Phule Trust Advocate - S M Sansare
-
2.The Headmaster, Dnyanprabhat Vidya Mandir
-
3.The Administrative Officer, PCMC, School Board
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The School Tribunal, Pune transferred the execution of its April 2025 decree (ordering reinstatement and back wages of ₹38,97,470) to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pimpri Chinchwad for enforcement. The Tribunal rejected the applicant's contempt action request, holding that since the respondents had challenged the decree before the High Court without obtaining a stay, an efficacious alternate remedy existed, and the Tribunal itself possessed civil court powers under the MEPS Act to transfer the decree for execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Presiding Officer
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgment
Presiding Officer
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
25-Feb-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
18-Feb-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
16-Feb-2026
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
28-Jan-2026
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
20-Jan-2026
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
08-Jan-2026
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2025
Summary The School Tribunal, Pune transferred the execution of its April 2025 decree (ordering reinstatement and back wages of ₹38,97,470) to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pimpri Chinchwad for enforcement. The Tribunal rejected the applicant's contempt action request, holding that since the respondents had challenged the decree before the High Court without obtaining a stay, an efficacious alternate remedy existed, and the Tribunal itself possessed civil court powers under the MEPS Act to transfer the decree for execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts