Shri. Keshav Bapu Parab vs Karachi Maharashtriy Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Through its Chairman / Secretary Advocate - Adv. P.N.Kulkarni — 6/2025
Case under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 Section 09. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Appeal
CNR: MHSS090000102025
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
12-Feb-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
12-Feb-2025
Court
School Tribunal, Kolhapur
Judge
1-Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Keshav Bapu Parab
Adv. Adv. Shri. Sagar S. Mane
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karachi Maharashtriy Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Through its Chairman / Secretary Advocate - Adv. P.N.Kulkarni
-
2.The Chief Executive Officer, Karachi Maharashtriy Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
-
3.Kudal High School and Junior College, Kudal Through its Head Master
-
4.Bhogte Pravin Ganpat
-
5.The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad Sindhudurg
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
25-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
11-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
25-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
11-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
04-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The School Tribunal, Kolhapur rejected respondent no. 4's application to amend the written statement filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The tribunal found that since the written statement was filed jointly by respondents 1-4, it cannot be amended by respondent no. 4 alone without consent of other co-respondents, citing the High Court precedent in Smt. Chanda Kedia case. Additionally, the proposed amendments merely repeated contentions already covered in paragraphs 11, 14, 18, 19, and 22 of the original written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Documents
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
21-Jan-2026
Hearing On Exh-
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
07-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
12-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
15-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence of Respondent
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
25-Sep-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
03-Sep-2025
Documents
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
20-Aug-2025
Documents
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
18-Jul-2025
Documents
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
20-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
Written Arguments
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
11-Jun-2025
Written Arguments
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
15-Apr-2025
Written Arguments
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
02-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
05-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
Presiding Officer Kolhapur.
-
12-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
Summary: The School Tribunal, Kolhapur rejected respondent no. 4's application to amend the written statement filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The tribunal found that since the written statement was filed jointly by respondents 1-4, it cannot be amended by respondent no. 4 alone without consent of other co-respondents, citing the High Court precedent in Smt. Chanda Kedia case. Additionally, the proposed amendments merely repeated contentions already covered in paragraphs 11, 14, 18, 19, and 22 of the original written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts