Bapusing Rajput etc 9 vs Madhavsing Rajput etc 8 Advocate - Mehta Shailesh Ramanlal — 153/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO230040822023

Notice Ready

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

2095/2023

Filing Date

06-05-2017

Registration No

153/2023

Registration Date

06-05-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

Bapusing Rajput etc 9

Adv. Deshmukh P. H.

Anadsing Rajput

Jaysing Rajput

Hirabai Pardesi

Nandabai Rajput

Chandrabai Chavan

Sakhubai Rajput

Panabai Rajput

Sumanbai Rajput

Respondent(s)

Madhavsing Rajput etc 8 Advocate - Mehta Shailesh Ramanlal

Jalamsing Rajput (Died)

2A) Kubersing Rajput

2B) Dhanusing Rajput

2C) Anusaya Pardeshi

2D) Jayashri Pardeshi

2E) Manisha Thakur

2F) Bakulabai Pardeshi

Gopalsing Rajput

Chababai Pardeshi

Vijabai Pardeshi

Chiubai Rajput

Mangal Pardeshi

Mirabai Thakur

9. Ishwarsing Narayansing pardeshi

10. Shahaji Sumanta Doifhode

11. Satish Narhari Ubale

12. Manohar Mahadev Ubale

13. Mangal Ankush Ubale

14. Sunil Ankush Ubale

15. Nilesh Ankush Ubale

16. Baliram Mahadev Ubale

17. Savita Baliram Ubale

18. Santosh Baliram Ubale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA

23-04-2026

Notice Ready

13-03-2026

Notice Ready

16-02-2026

Notice Ready

12-01-2026

Notice Ready

28-11-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

24-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 153/2023 - Bapusing Rajput v. Madhavsing Rajput The Civil Court at Madha partially allowed the petitioner's application to amend the suit by including additional family property and necessary parties. The court granted the amendment request but imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the petitioner, rejecting the respondent's objection that the amendment would prejudice their defense. The court directed the petitioner to complete the amendment within a specified period before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 153/2023 - Bapusing Rajput v. Madhavsing Rajput The Civil Court at Madha partially allowed the petitioner's application to amend the suit by including additional family property and necessary parties. The court granted the amendment request but imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the petitioner, rejecting the respondent's objection that the amendment would prejudice their defense. The court directed the petitioner to complete the amendment within a specified period before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case