Bapusing Rajput etc 9 vs Madhavsing Rajput etc 8 Advocate - Mehta Shailesh Ramanlal — 153/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Notice Ready Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO230040822023

Filing Number

2095/2023

Filing Date

06-May-2017

Registration No

153/2023

Registration Date

06-May-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

1.Bapusing Rajput etc 9

Adv. Deshmukh P. H.
2.Anadsing Rajput
3.Jaysing Rajput
4.Hirabai Pardesi
5.Nandabai Rajput
6.Chandrabai Chavan
7.Sakhubai Rajput
8.Panabai Rajput
9.Sumanbai Rajput

Respondent(s)

1.Madhavsing Rajput etc 8 Advocate - Mehta Shailesh Ramanlal
2.Jalamsing Rajput (Died)
3.2A) Kubersing Rajput
4.2B) Dhanusing Rajput
5.2C) Anusaya Pardeshi
6.2D) Jayashri Pardeshi
7.2E) Manisha Thakur
8.2F) Bakulabai Pardeshi
9.Gopalsing Rajput
10.Chababai Pardeshi
11.Vijabai Pardeshi
12.Chiubai Rajput
13.Mangal Pardeshi
14.Mirabai Thakur
15.9. Ishwarsing Narayansing pardeshi
16.10. Shahaji Sumanta Doifhode
17.11. Satish Narhari Ubale
18.12. Manohar Mahadev Ubale
19.13. Mangal Ankush Ubale
20.14. Sunil Ankush Ubale
21.15. Nilesh Ankush Ubale
22.16. Baliram Mahadev Ubale
23.17. Savita Baliram Ubale
24.18. Santosh Baliram Ubale

Case History

25-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
23-Apr-2026

Notice Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
13-Mar-2026

Notice Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
16-Feb-2026

Notice Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
12-Jan-2026

Notice Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
28-Nov-2025

Steps

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
27-Oct-2025

Steps

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
03-Sep-2025

Evidence

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
07-Jul-2025

Summons_Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
24-Jun-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: 153/2023 - Bapusing Rajput v. Madhavsing Rajput The Civil Court at Madha partially allowed the petitioner's application to amend the suit by including additional family property and necessary parties. The court granted the amendment request but imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the petitioner, rejecting the respondent's objection that the amendment would prejudice their defense. The court directed the petitioner to complete the amendment within a specified period before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
24-Jun-2025

Steps

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
17-Apr-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
10-Mar-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
31-Jan-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
09-Jan-2025

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
09-Oct-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
25-Sep-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
08-Aug-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
10-Jul-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
25-Jun-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
24-Apr-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
20-Mar-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
12-Mar-2024

Steps

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
23-Feb-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
24-Jan-2024

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
15-Dec-2023

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
24-Nov-2023

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
20-Oct-2023

—

CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha
29-Sep-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-May-2017

Case filed

Registration No. 153/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 153/2023 - Bapusing Rajput v. Madhavsing Rajput The Civil Court at Madha partially allowed the petitioner's application to amend the suit by including additional family property and necessary parties. The court granted the amendment request but imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the petitioner, rejecting the respondent's objection that the amendment would prejudice their defense. The court directed the petitioner to complete the amendment within a specified period before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.