The Federal Bank Ltd though Vilas Trimbakrao Lande vs Harshwardhan Bharat Godage — 304/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO230012472023

Filing Number

623/2023

Filing Date

19-Jan-2023

Registration No

304/2023

Registration Date

19-Jan-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Federal Bank Ltd though Vilas Trimbakrao Lande

    Adv. Khandelwal Sanjay B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harshwardhan Bharat Godage

  2. 2.Bharat Govind Godage

  3. 3.Prakash Govind Godage

  4. 4.Bukeshwar Prakash Godage

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: The Federal Bank Ltd. v. Harshavardhan Bharat Godage (304/2023) The court decreed the suit in favor of The Federal Bank Ltd., ordering the defendants to pay jointly and severally Rs. 8,95,756/- with interest at 11.30% per annum. The court found that defendant No. 1 had availed Federal Kisan Cash Credit and Agricultural Medium Term loans, while defendants 2-4 had stood as personal guarantors, and despite acknowledging their liability through multiple balance confirmation letters, they failed to repay the amount since June 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Citation

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  12. 27-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  18. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  19. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  21. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  22. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  23. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  24. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  25. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  26. 11-Dec-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  27. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  28. 19-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  29. 25-Sep-2023

    Summons_Ready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  30. 04-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  31. 12-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 19-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 304/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Federal Bank Ltd. v. Harshavardhan Bharat Godage (304/2023) The court decreed the suit in favor of The Federal Bank Ltd., ordering the defendants to pay jointly and severally Rs. 8,95,756/- with interest at 11.30% per annum. The court found that defendant No. 1 had availed Federal Kisan Cash Credit and Agricultural Medium Term loans, while defendants 2-4 had stood as personal guarantors, and despite acknowledging their liability through multiple balance confirmation letters, they failed to repay the amount since June 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case