The Federal Bank Ltd though Vilas Trimbakrao Lande vs Harshwardhan Bharat Godage — 304/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 23rd April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHSO230012472023
Filing Number
623/2023
Filing Date
19-01-2023
Registration No
304/2023
Registration Date
19-01-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Madha
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Federal Bank Ltd though Vilas Trimbakrao Lande
Adv. Khandelwal Sanjay B
Respondent(s)
Harshwardhan Bharat Godage
Bharat Govind Godage
Prakash Govind Godage
Bukeshwar Prakash Godage
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA
Disposed
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | Citation |
| 04-04-2026 | Citation |
| 13-03-2026 | Citation |
| 09-03-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The Federal Bank Ltd. v. Harshavardhan Bharat Godage (304/2023) The court decreed the suit in favor of The Federal Bank Ltd., ordering the defendants to pay jointly and severally Rs. 8,95,756/- with interest at 11.30% per annum. The court found that defendant No. 1 had availed Federal Kisan Cash Credit and Agricultural Medium Term loans, while defendants 2-4 had stood as personal guarantors, and despite acknowledging their liability through multiple balance confirmation letters, they failed to repay the amount since June 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Federal Bank Ltd. v. Harshavardhan Bharat Godage (304/2023) The court decreed the suit in favor of The Federal Bank Ltd., ordering the defendants to pay jointly and severally Rs. 8,95,756/- with interest at 11.30% per annum. The court found that defendant No. 1 had availed Federal Kisan Cash Credit and Agricultural Medium Term loans, while defendants 2-4 had stood as personal guarantors, and despite acknowledging their liability through multiple balance confirmation letters, they failed to repay the amount since June 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts