Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh vs Government of Maharashtra etc Advocate - Tambile N.K. — 98/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO230006092023

Filing Number

304/2023

Filing Date

14-Feb-2022

Registration No

98/2023

Registration Date

14-Feb-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh

    Adv. Anpat Mohan Baburao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Maharashtra etc Advocate - Tambile N.K.

  2. 2.Executive Engineer

    Adv. N. K. Tambile

  3. 3.Collector

  4. 4.Divisional Officer

  5. 5.Suman Limbaji More

  6. 6.Limbaji Nagnath More

  7. 7.Baby Devidas Sarde

  8. 8.Gorakh Maruti Deshmukh

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Order

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 98/2023 - Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh v. Government of Maharashtra Outcome: The petition was dismissed. Respondents 1-4 and the advocate were absent; cross-examination of petitioner Samadhan Deshmukh was conducted based on his sworn statement regarding property disputes. The court found no relief could be granted, as the petitioner's claim concerning plot 903/2/b (53 acres) and allegations regarding the Sina-Matha canal project lacked substantive merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  13. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  15. 20-Jun-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  17. 11-Apr-2025

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  18. 21-Mar-2025

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  20. 14-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 14-Oct-2024

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  22. 18-Sep-2024

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  23. 28-Aug-2024

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  24. 21-Aug-2024

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  25. 24-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  26. 03-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  27. 15-Mar-2024

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  28. 17-Feb-2024

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  29. 01-Jan-2024

    Notice_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  30. 22-Nov-2023

    Notice_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  31. 02-Sep-2023

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  32. 02-Aug-2023

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  33. 10-Jul-2023

    IssuesView PDF

  34. 10-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 14-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 98/2023 - Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh v. Government of Maharashtra Outcome: The petition was dismissed. Respondents 1-4 and the advocate were absent; cross-examination of petitioner Samadhan Deshmukh was conducted based on his sworn statement regarding property disputes. The court found no relief could be granted, as the petitioner's claim concerning plot 903/2/b (53 acres) and allegations regarding the Sina-Matha canal project lacked substantive merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case