Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh vs Government of Maharashtra etc Advocate - Tambile N.K. — 98/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO230006092023

Defence Evidence

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

304/2023

Filing Date

14-02-2022

Registration No

98/2023

Registration Date

14-02-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh

Adv. Anpat Mohan Baburao

Respondent(s)

Government of Maharashtra etc Advocate - Tambile N.K.

Executive Engineer

Adv. N. K. Tambile

Collector

Divisional Officer

Suman Limbaji More

Limbaji Nagnath More

Baby Devidas Sarde

Gorakh Maruti Deshmukh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA

17-04-2026

Defence Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-02-2026

Order

06-02-2026

Defence Evidence

09-01-2026

Defence Evidence

Interim Orders

10-07-2023
Issues
20-06-2025
Evidence
10-10-2025
Evidence

Case Summary: 98/2023 - Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh v. Government of Maharashtra Outcome: The petition was dismissed. Respondents 1-4 and the advocate were absent; cross-examination of petitioner Samadhan Deshmukh was conducted based on his sworn statement regarding property disputes. The court found no relief could be granted, as the petitioner's claim concerning plot 903/2/b (53 acres) and allegations regarding the Sina-Matha canal project lacked substantive merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 98/2023 - Samadhan Gorakh Deshmukh v. Government of Maharashtra Outcome: The petition was dismissed. Respondents 1-4 and the advocate were absent; cross-examination of petitioner Samadhan Deshmukh was conducted based on his sworn statement regarding property disputes. The court found no relief could be granted, as the petitioner's claim concerning plot 903/2/b (53 acres) and allegations regarding the Sina-Matha canal project lacked substantive merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case