NAGNATH LAXMAN TARANGE vs None — 10/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHSO230004002025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-09-2025

Filing Number

424/2025

Filing Date

11-09-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

12-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

NAGNATH LAXMAN TARANGE

Adv. PINJARI SURESH MANOHAR

Sarika Santosh Sule

Adv. PINJARI SURESH MANOHAR

URMILA BAPU PINJARI

Adv. PINJARI SURESH MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

None

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA

13-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

Arguments

02-02-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

22-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the succession certificate petition filed by the husband and two daughters of deceased Laxmibai Nagnath Tarange under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. After verifying the death certificate, bank deposit receipts, and Aadhar cards, the court found sufficient evidence establishing the petitioners as the only legal heirs and authorized them to receive Rs. 5,05,008/- from the fixed deposit account at Bank of Maharashtra upon payment of court fees and furnishing an indemnity bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the succession certificate petition filed by the husband and two daughters of deceased Laxmibai Nagnath Tarange under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. After verifying the death certificate, bank deposit receipts, and Aadhar cards, the court found sufficient evidence establishing the petitioners as the only legal heirs and authorized them to receive Rs. 5,05,008/- from the fixed deposit account at Bank of Maharashtra upon payment of court fees and furnishing an indemnity bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case