SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD Branch Kurduwadi Through Kishorisinh Mahadeo Tambe vs Sunil Shivaji Gore — 111/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Steps_Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Arbitration R.D

CNR: MHSO230002302025

e-Filing Number

02-05-2025

Filing Number

252/2025

Filing Date

06-May-2025

Registration No

111/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Madha

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36
Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD Branch Kurduwadi Through Kishorisinh Mahadeo Tambe

    Adv. MUKANE YOGESH MAHADEO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Shivaji Gore

  2. 2.Umesh Sadashiv Gore

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  3. 24-Feb-2026

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  5. 22-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Madha

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In ARD 111/2025, Shriram Finance Ltd (through Kishorisinh Mahadeo Tambe) versus Sunil Shivaji Gore and Umesh Sadashiv Gore, the Civil Judge Senior Division at Madha issued an order on 19-07-2025 directing that notice be issued to the Judge(s). The case was adjourned for service of notice on the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 19-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In ARD 111/2025, Shriram Finance Ltd (through Kishorisinh Mahadeo Tambe) versus Sunil Shivaji Gore and Umesh Sadashiv Gore, the Civil Judge Senior Division at Madha issued an order on 19-07-2025 directing that notice be issued to the Judge(s). The case was adjourned for service of notice on the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case