Gayabai Tukaram Naikwade Alias Naikwadi vs Dattatray Tukaram Naikwade Alias Naikwadi — 6/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO230001222024
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2024
Filing Number
122/2024
Filing Date
31-01-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
01-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Madha
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gayabai Tukaram Naikwade Alias Naikwadi
Adv. Deshmukh Dinkar Mohan
Respondent(s)
Dattatray Tukaram Naikwade Alias Naikwadi
Tehsildar Of Madha
Village Talathi Saheb
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION MADHA
Arguments
List of Witness
Evidence
Public Notice/Proclamation
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | List of Witness |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 25-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 6/2024 Petitioner: Gayabai Tukaram Naikwade (80 years, farmer, Umerga, Madha Taluka, Solapur District) Respondents: Dattatray Tukaram Naikwade and Tehsildar of Madha Order: The petition was allowed. The court accepted the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents (including police missing person report, gram panchayat records, and property documents regarding ancestral fields and house) as evidence. The respondent failed to appear; no counter-argument was filed. The case was decided in favor of the petitioner on 23/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 6/2024 Petitioner: Gayabai Tukaram Naikwade (80 years, farmer, Umerga, Madha Taluka, Solapur District) Respondents: Dattatray Tukaram Naikwade and Tehsildar of Madha Order: The petition was allowed. The court accepted the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents (including police missing person report, gram panchayat records, and property documents regarding ancestral fields and house) as evidence. The respondent failed to appear; no counter-argument was filed. The case was decided in favor of the petitioner on 23/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts