Dattatray Mahalu Gaikwad vs Shridhar Damodar Suryapujari and others — 873/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 16. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHSO220052232023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
2739/2023
Filing Date
14-08-2023
Registration No
873/2023
Registration Date
16-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray Mahalu Gaikwad
Adv. Raut B. R.
Respondent(s)
Shridhar Damodar Suryapujari and others
Sufiya Kalim Kazi
Nitesh Vilas Pawar
Hanumant Vilas Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary - Case 873/2023 In this specific performance of contract suit, defendants 1-4 successfully sought to set aside a "no cross" order dated 05.03.2026. The court allowed their application because their advocate was unavailable due to medical reasons and they were denied the opportunity to conduct cross-examination. The court held that both parties must have equal opportunity to present their case and set aside the "no cross" order, allowing the defendants to proceed with cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary - Case 873/2023 In this specific performance of contract suit, defendants 1-4 successfully sought to set aside a "no cross" order dated 05.03.2026. The court allowed their application because their advocate was unavailable due to medical reasons and they were denied the opportunity to conduct cross-examination. The court held that both parties must have equal opportunity to present their case and set aside the "no cross" order, allowing the defendants to proceed with cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts