Laxman Maruti Savalkar vs Surekha Laxman Gargade etc. — 871/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,36. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO220051782023

Filing Number

2693/2023

Filing Date

27-Jul-2023

Registration No

871/2023

Registration Date

27-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Maruti Savalkar

    Adv. Kamble M. D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Surekha Laxman Gargade etc.

  2. 2.Sharada Martand Gargade

  3. 3.Shrikant Bhimrao Pansare

  4. 4.Umesh Tanaji Jadhav

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: Case 871/2023 - Laxman Maruti Savalkar v. Surekha Laxman Gargade The Civil Judge allowed Defendant No.4's application to condone a 3-month 20-day delay in filing a written statement, citing unavailability of documents and professional obligations as a doctor. The court imposed costs of Rs.100 payable to the plaintiff to compensate for inconvenience caused by the prolonged matter, recognizing all parties' right to challenge the declaration and permanent injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  12. 19-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  13. 19-Jun-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  14. 07-Apr-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  15. 11-Feb-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  16. 13-Dec-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  17. 18-Oct-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  18. 04-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  19. 14-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  20. 19-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  21. 19-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  22. 03-May-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  23. 01-Apr-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  24. 11-Mar-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  25. 11-Dec-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  26. 29-Nov-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  27. 25-Oct-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  28. 15-Sep-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  29. 19-Aug-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  30. 31-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 27-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 871/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 871/2023 - Laxman Maruti Savalkar v. Surekha Laxman Gargade The Civil Judge allowed Defendant No.4's application to condone a 3-month 20-day delay in filing a written statement, citing unavailability of documents and professional obligations as a doctor. The court imposed costs of Rs.100 payable to the plaintiff to compensate for inconvenience caused by the prolonged matter, recognizing all parties' right to challenge the declaration and permanent injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case