Dada Shiva Kare vs Ramesh Tukaram Godage Advocate - Sonawane D. M. — 300/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO220048062023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

2429/2023

Filing Date

26-08-2019

Registration No

300/2023

Registration Date

26-08-2019

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Ia/2/2021 Classification : Section Dada Shiva KareRamesh Tukaram Godage

Petitioner(s)

Dada Shiva Kare

Adv. Desai Dhananjay R

Respondent(s)

Ramesh Tukaram Godage Advocate - Sonawane D. M.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

04-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

24-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

30-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

17-01-2024
Evidence
31-08-2024
Evidence
04-07-2025
Evidence
13-02-2024
Evidence
30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 300/2023 (Dada Kare v. Ramesh Godge) The court framed an additional issue in this permanent injunction suit after arguments concluded. The plaintiff claims ownership of the disputed property through inheritance from Jamnabai, while the defendant claims ownership via a registered sale deed dated 15.03.2005. The court ordered the addition of a new issue: "Whether plaintiff proves his ownership over the suit property after demise of Jamnabai?" to be decided before adjudicating possession and injunction entitlement. The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 300/2023 (Dada Kare v. Ramesh Godge) The court framed an additional issue in this permanent injunction suit after arguments concluded. The plaintiff claims ownership of the disputed property through inheritance from Jamnabai, while the defendant claims ownership via a registered sale deed dated 15.03.2005. The court ordered the addition of a new issue: "Whether plaintiff proves his ownership over the suit property after demise of Jamnabai?" to be decided before adjudicating possession and injunction entitlement. The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case