ICICI BANK LIMITED vs Bharat Murlidhar Salunke — 823/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO220025192023

Case disposed

Filing Number

1260/2023

Filing Date

13-10-2022

Registration No

823/2023

Registration Date

14-10-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

ICICI BANK LIMITED

Adv. More Vishnu Dashrath

Respondent(s)

Bharat Murlidhar Salunke

Sunanda Bharat Salunke

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Defence Evidence

18-02-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

03-02-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Bharat Murlidhar Salunke & Sunanda Bharat Salunke (823/2023) The court decreed the suit partially in favor of ICICI Bank. The defendants defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) agricultural loan of Rs. 6,06,005, which the bank had duly documented and recalled via notice in January 2022. Although the defendants failed to appear, the court found the claim proven through bank records and witness testimony. However, while the bank claimed 15.20% interest, the court reduced it to 9% per annum, deeming the contract non-commercial and applying Section 34 CPC. The defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount with 9% interest from suit institution until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Bharat Murlidhar Salunke & Sunanda Bharat Salunke (823/2023) The court decreed the suit partially in favor of ICICI Bank. The defendants defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) agricultural loan of Rs. 6,06,005, which the bank had duly documented and recalled via notice in January 2022. Although the defendants failed to appear, the court found the claim proven through bank records and witness testimony. However, while the bank claimed 15.20% interest, the court reduced it to 9% per annum, deeming the contract non-commercial and applying Section 34 CPC. The defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount with 9% interest from suit institution until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case