ICICI BANK LIMITED vs Bharat Murlidhar Salunke — 823/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO220025192023

Filing Number

1260/2023

Filing Date

13-Oct-2022

Registration No

823/2023

Registration Date

14-Oct-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI BANK LIMITED

    Adv. More Vishnu Dashrath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Murlidhar Salunke

  2. 2.Sunanda Bharat Salunke

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Bharat Murlidhar Salunke & Sunanda Bharat Salunke (823/2023) The court decreed the suit partially in favor of ICICI Bank. The defendants defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) agricultural loan of Rs. 6,06,005, which the bank had duly documented and recalled via notice in January 2022. Although the defendants failed to appear, the court found the claim proven through bank records and witness testimony. However, while the bank claimed 15.20% interest, the court reduced it to 9% per annum, deeming the contract non-commercial and applying Section 34 CPC. The defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount with 9% interest from suit institution until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  13. 25-Apr-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  14. 21-Feb-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  15. 07-Dec-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  16. 07-Nov-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  17. 18-Sep-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  18. 02-Aug-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  19. 07-May-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  20. 19-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  21. 19-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  22. 25-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  23. 24-Aug-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  24. 16-Jun-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  25. 27-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 13-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 823/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Bharat Murlidhar Salunke & Sunanda Bharat Salunke (823/2023) The court decreed the suit partially in favor of ICICI Bank. The defendants defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) agricultural loan of Rs. 6,06,005, which the bank had duly documented and recalled via notice in January 2022. Although the defendants failed to appear, the court found the claim proven through bank records and witness testimony. However, while the bank claimed 15.20% interest, the court reduced it to 9% per annum, deeming the contract non-commercial and applying Section 34 CPC. The defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount with 9% interest from suit institution until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case