ICICI BANK LIMITED vs Bharat Murlidhar Salunke — 823/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHSO220025192023
Filing Number
1260/2023
Filing Date
13-10-2022
Registration No
823/2023
Registration Date
14-10-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ICICI BANK LIMITED
Adv. More Vishnu Dashrath
Respondent(s)
Bharat Murlidhar Salunke
Sunanda Bharat Salunke
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala
Disposed
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 03-02-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Bharat Murlidhar Salunke & Sunanda Bharat Salunke (823/2023) The court decreed the suit partially in favor of ICICI Bank. The defendants defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) agricultural loan of Rs. 6,06,005, which the bank had duly documented and recalled via notice in January 2022. Although the defendants failed to appear, the court found the claim proven through bank records and witness testimony. However, while the bank claimed 15.20% interest, the court reduced it to 9% per annum, deeming the contract non-commercial and applying Section 34 CPC. The defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount with 9% interest from suit institution until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Bharat Murlidhar Salunke & Sunanda Bharat Salunke (823/2023) The court decreed the suit partially in favor of ICICI Bank. The defendants defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) agricultural loan of Rs. 6,06,005, which the bank had duly documented and recalled via notice in January 2022. Although the defendants failed to appear, the court found the claim proven through bank records and witness testimony. However, while the bank claimed 15.20% interest, the court reduced it to 9% per annum, deeming the contract non-commercial and applying Section 34 CPC. The defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount with 9% interest from suit institution until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts