ICICI BANK LIMITED vs Narayan Narhari Markad — 799/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO220024712023

Filing Number

1236/2023

Filing Date

03-Oct-2022

Registration No

799/2023

Registration Date

11-Oct-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI BANK LIMITED

    Adv. Tarke Rupali Dattatray

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Narhari Markad

  2. 2.Narhari Narayan Markad

  3. 3.Sonali Narayan Markad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Narayan Narhari Markad (799/2023) The court partly decreed ICICI Bank's recovery suit against agricultural borrowers who defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) loan. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 6,52,108 with 9% annual interest from suit institution until realization, though the bank claimed 14.13% contractual interest. The court found the loan transaction non-commercial and applied Section 34 CPC's 6% interest ceiling as reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  13. 25-Apr-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  14. 21-Feb-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  15. 07-Dec-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  16. 07-Nov-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  17. 27-Sep-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  18. 05-Aug-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  19. 07-May-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  20. 02-Apr-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  21. 03-Mar-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  22. 14-Feb-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  23. 11-Dec-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  24. 05-Oct-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  25. 11-Sep-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  26. 19-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  27. 05-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  28. 03-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  29. 21-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 03-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 799/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Narayan Narhari Markad (799/2023) The court partly decreed ICICI Bank's recovery suit against agricultural borrowers who defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) loan. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 6,52,108 with 9% annual interest from suit institution until realization, though the bank claimed 14.13% contractual interest. The court found the loan transaction non-commercial and applied Section 34 CPC's 6% interest ceiling as reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case