Sunil Harichand Luniya vs Baliram Vithoba Chinchkar Advocate - Devi B. T. — 513/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO220018992023

Arguments

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

950/2023

Filing Date

24-11-2020

Registration No

513/2023

Registration Date

10-12-2020

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Harichand Luniya

Adv. Raut B. R.

Respondent(s)

Baliram Vithoba Chinchkar Advocate - Devi B. T.

Mangal Baliram Chinchkar

Shivaji Baliram Chinchkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

28-05-2026

Arguments

08-05-2026

Arguments

07-05-2026

Arguments

28-04-2026

Arguments

17-04-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

09-01-2024
Evidence
25-03-2025
Evidence
04-03-2026
Evidence
13-03-2026
Evidence
13-03-2026
Evidence
13-03-2026
Evidence
13-03-2026
Evidence
17-03-2026
Evidence
17-03-2026
Evidence
28-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

In Spl.C.S.No.513 of 2023 (Sunil Luniya v. Baliram Chinchkar), the court adjourned the matter for arguments and directed the defendant to advance specific arguments on points C, D, and E of the Development Agreement dated 10.01.2016 regarding payment obligations and land forfeiture consequences, along with arguments on the non-joinder of necessary parties and amounts of Rs.5,00,000/- and Rs.10,00,000/- allegedly received from the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Spl.C.S.No.513 of 2023 (Sunil Luniya v. Baliram Chinchkar), the court adjourned the matter for arguments and directed the defendant to advance specific arguments on points C, D, and E of the Development Agreement dated 10.01.2016 regarding payment obligations and land forfeiture consequences, along with arguments on the non-joinder of necessary parties and amounts of Rs.5,00,000/- and Rs.10,00,000/- allegedly received from the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case