Chandrashen Sarjerov Shinde vs Udhavrov Madhavrov Sarde etc 8 Advocate - Mangale Kisan Sambhaji — 142/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHSO220002722025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-06-2025

Filing Number

276/2025

Filing Date

10-06-2025

Registration No

142/2025

Registration Date

10-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Chandrashen Sarjerov Shinde

Respondent(s)

Udhavrov Madhavrov Sarde etc 8 Advocate - Mangale Kisan Sambhaji

Kesavrao Bhagwanrao Salunkhe 2.

Gurudas Madhavrao Sarade Died Legal Hairs Shanta Gurudas Sarade 2.

Dipa Gurudas Sarde 2.

Abhijit Gurudas Sarde 2.

Akshay Gurudas Sarde 2.

Trupti Gurudas Sarde 2.

Tupa Gurudas Sarde

Kesavrao Bhagwanrao Salunkhe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

08-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

06-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Spl. C.S. No. 142/2025 (Chandrasen Shinde v. Udhavrao Sarde & Others) The court allowed defendants' application to file a delayed written statement in this partition and declaration suit. Defendants sought condonation of a 16-day delay, citing being out of station and inability to contact their advocate. The court, applying the principle of natural justice (*audi alteram partem*), granted the application subject to costs of Rs. 100 payable to the plaintiff, condoned the delay, and directed the written statement be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Spl. C.S. No. 142/2025 (Chandrasen Shinde v. Udhavrao Sarde & Others) The court allowed defendants' application to file a delayed written statement in this partition and declaration suit. Defendants sought condonation of a 16-day delay, citing being out of station and inability to contact their advocate. The court, applying the principle of natural justice (*audi alteram partem*), granted the application subject to costs of Rs. 100 payable to the plaintiff, condoned the delay, and directed the written statement be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case