Adihinath Sah.Sakhar Ka.Ltd. vs Allauddin Pathan etc. — 4/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Awaiting Warrant Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl .Dkst

CNR: MHSO220002212023

Filing Number

111/2023

Filing Date

05-Jan-2010

Registration No

4/2023

Registration Date

06-Jan-2010

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karmala

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Adihinath Sah.Sakhar Ka.Ltd.

    Adv. Deshmukh R.D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Allauddin Pathan etc.

  2. 2.Abhiman Waman Narasale

  3. 3.Ramhari Rangnath Yetale

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  10. 01-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  11. 12-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Unready Board

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  15. 21-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  16. 01-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  17. 10-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 4/2023 Summary: The case pending since 2023 was adjourned. The court found that the decree holder (plaintiff) failed to furnish a list of movable articles with their recovery warrant application. The court directed the decree holder to take necessary steps and comply with this requirement by the next hearing date, warning that failure to do so will result in further orders being passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 10-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  19. 17-Jan-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  20. 04-Dec-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  21. 22-Nov-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  22. 25-Oct-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  23. 10-Oct-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  24. 03-Sep-2024

    Unready Board

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  26. 18-Jun-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  27. 23-Feb-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  28. 19-Jan-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  29. 26-Oct-2023

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  30. 24-Aug-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  31. 15-Jun-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  32. 12-Apr-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  33. 24-Feb-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Karmala

  34. 08-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 05-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 4/2023 Summary: The case pending since 2023 was adjourned. The court found that the decree holder (plaintiff) failed to furnish a list of movable articles with their recovery warrant application. The court directed the decree holder to take necessary steps and comply with this requirement by the next hearing date, warning that failure to do so will result in further orders being passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case