Samira alias Sanu Aspak Shaikh vs Aspak Chandulal Shaikh — 498/2025
Case under Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200030212025
e-Filing Number
09-12-2025
Filing Number
643/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
498/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samira alias Sanu Aspak Shaikh
Adv. SHINDE SANJEEV SAHABRAO
Respondent(s)
Aspak Chandulal Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 21-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 498/2025 Summary: The court disposed of Samira's suit for dissolution of marriage under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act 1939 and Specific Relief Act by accepting a joint compromise pursis filed by both parties. The court found that the parties had mutually settled their dispute and admitted the compromise terms as true and correct, resulting in a final disposal of the suit in accordance with the agreed settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 498/2025 Summary: The court disposed of Samira's suit for dissolution of marriage under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act 1939 and Specific Relief Act by accepting a joint compromise pursis filed by both parties. The court found that the parties had mutually settled their dispute and admitted the compromise terms as true and correct, resulting in a final disposal of the suit in accordance with the agreed settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts