Chandrakant Sandipan Kengar vs Manohar Ganpat Kengar Advocate - Babar Sachin Jagannath. — 664/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Hearing Without W.S. Next hearing 20-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200026932022

Filing Number

832/2022

Filing Date

07-Dec-2022

Registration No

664/2022

Registration Date

07-Dec-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakant Sandipan Kengar

    Adv. Bhosale V. M.

  2. 2.Amar Sandipan Kengar

  3. 3.Mangal Laxman Shitole

  4. 4.Sunita Sanjay Aiwale

  5. 5.Tulsabai Sandipan Kengar

  6. 6.Bhiva Shankar Kengar(Legal Heir) 6.

  7. 7.Anil Bhiva Kengar 6.

  8. 8.Sunil Bhiva Kengar 6.

  9. 9.Sadhana Rama Kengar 6.

  10. 10.Savita Bira Hegde 6.

  11. 11.Bhama Bhiva Kengar

  12. 12.Jai Namdev Bhandage

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manohar Ganpat Kengar Advocate - Babar Sachin Jagannath.

  2. 2.Arun Ganpat Kengar

    Adv. Exparty

  3. 3.Tai Tukaram Aiwale

    Adv. Exparty

  4. 4.Ganguabi Ganpat Kengar

  5. 5.Anusaya Bhausaheb Kengar

    Adv. Exparty

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 664/2022 Court: Civil Judge, Sangola | Date: 13 March 2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' application for interim relief (temporary injunction) prohibiting property sale. The court found insufficient evidence that petitioners have a prima facie case, that balance of convenience favors them, or that irreparable harm would occur without the order. No cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  18. 12-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  19. 11-Dec-2024

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  20. 30-Aug-2024

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  21. 02-May-2024

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  22. 08-Feb-2024

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  23. 06-Nov-2023

    Steps_Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  24. 11-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  25. 22-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  26. 13-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  27. 02-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  28. 09-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 07-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 664/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 664/2022 Court: Civil Judge, Sangola | Date: 13 March 2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' application for interim relief (temporary injunction) prohibiting property sale. The court found insufficient evidence that petitioners have a prima facie case, that balance of convenience favors them, or that irreparable harm would occur without the order. No cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case