Rutuja Suhas Torane Through Balu Ranappa Chandanshive vs Suhas Bhupal Torane and 4 Advocate - Inamdar M.S. — 52/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,23. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHSO200024992024

e-Filing Number

17-12-2024

Filing Number

1877/2024

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

52/2024

Registration Date

19-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rutuja Suhas Torane Through Balu Ranappa Chandanshive

    Adv. Padalkar Satish Vitthal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suhas Bhupal Torane and 4 Advocate - Inamdar M.S.

  2. 2.Bhupal Tukaram Torane

  3. 3.Vatsala Bhupal Torane

  4. 4.Madhuri Kiran Magare

  5. 5.Puja Vishal Waghmare

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 52/2024 Summary The court granted the petition filed by Rutuja Suhas Torane (represented through Balu Ranappa Chandanshive) against respondents Suhas Bhupal Torane and others. The petitioner sought to set aside a one-sided order passed against her, claiming she was unable to present her arguments due to medical treatment needs. The court found the delay justified and noted that natural justice required the petitioner be given an opportunity to present her case. The court set aside the ex-parte order, allowed the petition, directed immediate resumption of proceedings without obstruction, and imposed costs of Rs. 300 on the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  11. 01-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  13. 01-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  14. 19-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  15. 13-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  16. 14-May-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  17. 24-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  18. 21-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  19. 21-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 52/2024 Summary The court granted the petition filed by Rutuja Suhas Torane (represented through Balu Ranappa Chandanshive) against respondents Suhas Bhupal Torane and others. The petitioner sought to set aside a one-sided order passed against her, claiming she was unable to present her arguments due to medical treatment needs. The court found the delay justified and noted that natural justice required the petitioner be given an opportunity to present her case. The court set aside the ex-parte order, allowed the petition, directed immediate resumption of proceedings without obstruction, and imposed costs of Rs. 300 on the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case