State of Maharashtra vs Dnyanesyhwar Dattatraya Emade 8 Advocate - Deshmukh Sachin L — 303/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,143,147,149,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200024352017

Filing Number

1780/2017

Filing Date

20-Nov-2017

Registration No

303/2017

Registration Date

20-Nov-2017

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

260

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,143,147,149,323,504,506
Bombay Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dnyanesyhwar Dattatraya Emade 8 Advocate - Deshmukh Sachin L

  2. 2.Kapil Vasant Patil

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

  3. 3.Shambhu Balaso Emade

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

  4. 4.Duryodhan Sukhdev Emade

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

  5. 5.Narayan Sukhdev Emade

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

  6. 6.Bandu Sukhdev Emade

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

  7. 7.Sunil Balaso Emade

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

  8. 8.Kavdev Mahadev Emade

    Adv. Deshmukh Sachin L

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court acquitted all eight accused (Dnyaneshwar Dattatraya Emade, Kapil Vasant Patil, Shambhu Balaso Emade, and five others) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, and 149 on May 13, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt because the complainant admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, undermining the credibility of witnesses and making it impossible to establish the required elements of the offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 11-May-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 08-May-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 04-May-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  8. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  16. 05-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  17. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  18. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  19. 26-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  20. 04-Nov-2024

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  21. 20-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  22. 03-Jul-2024

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  23. 26-Apr-2024

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  24. 20-Feb-2024

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  25. 05-Dec-2023

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  26. 16-Sep-2023

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  27. 30-Jun-2023

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  28. 13-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Warrant

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  29. 11-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Warrant

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  30. 19-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Warrant

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  31. 12-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Warrant

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  32. 27-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Warrant

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  33. 25-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  34. 21-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  35. 10-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  36. 12-Aug-2021

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  37. 17-Jun-2021

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  38. 25-Mar-2021

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  39. 04-Jan-2021

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  40. 09-Nov-2020

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  41. 14-Jul-2020

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  42. 20-May-2020

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  43. 23-Mar-2020

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  44. 23-Jan-2020

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  45. 04-Dec-2019

    Charge

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  46. 01-Oct-2019

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  47. 20-Aug-2019

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  48. 17-Jun-2019

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  49. 23-Apr-2019

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  50. 26-Feb-2019

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  51. 22-Jan-2019

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  52. 05-Dec-2018

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  53. 20-Oct-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  54. 31-Aug-2018

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  55. 02-Aug-2018

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  56. 26-Jun-2018

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  57. 19-Apr-2018

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  58. 29-Jan-2018

    Charge

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  59. 20-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 20-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 303/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all eight accused (Dnyaneshwar Dattatraya Emade, Kapil Vasant Patil, Shambhu Balaso Emade, and five others) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, and 149 on May 13, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt because the complainant admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, undermining the credibility of witnesses and making it impossible to establish the required elements of the offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case