Laxman Murlidhar Babar vs Sanjay Bharat Babar Advocate - Babar Vilasrao Sakharam — 525/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200023892021

Filing Number

638/2021

Filing Date

28-Oct-2021

Registration No

525/2021

Registration Date

28-Oct-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Murlidhar Babar

    Adv. Pawar S.S.

  2. 2.Mathurabai Murlidhar Babar

    Adv. Pawar S.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Bharat Babar Advocate - Babar Vilasrao Sakharam

  2. 2.Annasaheb Babasaheb Babar

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  9. 29-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  12. 23-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  13. 02-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  14. 18-Jun-2025

    Defence Evidence

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  15. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  16. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  17. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  18. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  20. 21-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  21. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  22. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  23. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  25. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  26. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  27. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  28. 20-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  29. 28-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  30. 17-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  31. 19-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  32. 09-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  33. 17-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  34. 04-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  35. 08-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  36. 17-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  37. 20-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  38. 10-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  39. 08-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  40. 22-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  41. 20-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  42. 25-Aug-2022

    Issues

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  43. 08-Jul-2022

    Issues

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  44. 09-Jun-2022

    Issues

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  45. 28-Mar-2022

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  46. 05-Mar-2022

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  47. 10-Dec-2021

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 525/2021 Court: Joint Civil Judge, Sangola, Maharashtra Petitioners: Laxman Murlidhar Babar and Mathurabai Murlidhar Babar Respondents: Sanjay Bharat Babar (Advocate) and others Outcome: Petition allowed. The court directed the tahsildar of Sangola to prepare a new demarcation sketch of the land in question (Plot Nos. 73, 76/1, and 76/2, Aalgaon, Sangola taluka) based on the original tahsildar's order dated 01.10.2021, and to restore the petitioners' possession of the disputed property by removing obstacles. The court also directed that costs be borne by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  48. 10-Dec-2021

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  49. 29-Nov-2021

    Order on Exh

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  50. 24-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  51. 19-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  52. 16-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  53. 30-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 28-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 525/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 525/2021 Court: Joint Civil Judge, Sangola, Maharashtra Petitioners: Laxman Murlidhar Babar and Mathurabai Murlidhar Babar Respondents: Sanjay Bharat Babar (Advocate) and others Outcome: Petition allowed. The court directed the tahsildar of Sangola to prepare a new demarcation sketch of the land in question (Plot Nos. 73, 76/1, and 76/2, Aalgaon, Sangola taluka) based on the original tahsildar's order dated 01.10.2021, and to restore the petitioners' possession of the disputed property by removing obstacles. The court also directed that costs be borne by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case