Shashikant Soudagar Sudake vs Dipak Dashrath Bhagat Advocate - Rodage Sambhajirao S — 431/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200019592021

Filing Number

528/2021

Filing Date

14-Sep-2021

Registration No

431/2021

Registration Date

14-Sep-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shashikant Soudagar Sudake

    Adv. Hatekar Pandurang Shriram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipak Dashrath Bhagat Advocate - Rodage Sambhajirao S

  2. 2.Sanjay Dashrath Bhagat

    Adv. Rodage Sambhajirao S

  3. 3.Jayasri Ramesh Mane

  4. 4.Rajasri Shahu Pawar

  5. 5.Nirmala Sunil Bhagat

  6. 6.Nikita Mayur Patil

  7. 7.Amruta Sunil Bhagat

  8. 8.Dhanasri Sunil Bhagat

  9. 9.Kamal Rajaram Jangale

  10. 10.Mangal Chandrakant Chougule

  11. 11.Mahesh Annaso Katkar

  12. 12.Tanuja Annaso Katkar

  13. 13.Yogesh Annaso Katkar

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 431/2021 Petitioner: Shashikant Soudagar Sudake Respondents: Dipak Dashrath Bhagat Advocate and others Court: 2nd Additional Civil Court (Junior Division), Sangola Order Date: 28/01/2026 Outcome The petitioner's application to amend the affidavit by adding "Wadegaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Society" as a necessary party to the property dispute case was allowed. The court found that while the society's name was omitted from the 7/12 extract (property record) in the affidavit, the society had no actual interest or rights in the disputed property, making it an unnecessary party. The court rejected the respondent's objection and permitted the correction to the affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  13. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  15. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  17. 13-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  19. 07-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  20. 09-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  21. 02-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  22. 10-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  23. 24-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  24. 01-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  25. 23-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  26. 20-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  27. 11-Sep-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  28. 10-Aug-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  29. 04-May-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  30. 19-Apr-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  31. 02-Mar-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  32. 18-Jan-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  33. 07-Dec-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  34. 11-Nov-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  35. 23-Sep-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  36. 02-Aug-2022

    Steps

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  37. 30-Apr-2022

    Steps

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  38. 08-Apr-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  39. 25-Feb-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  40. 25-Jan-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  41. 21-Dec-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  42. 18-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  43. 15-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 14-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 431/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 431/2021 Petitioner: Shashikant Soudagar Sudake Respondents: Dipak Dashrath Bhagat Advocate and others Court: 2nd Additional Civil Court (Junior Division), Sangola Order Date: 28/01/2026 Outcome The petitioner's application to amend the affidavit by adding "Wadegaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Society" as a necessary party to the property dispute case was allowed. The court found that while the society's name was omitted from the 7/12 extract (property record) in the affidavit, the society had no actual interest or rights in the disputed property, making it an unnecessary party. The court rejected the respondent's objection and permitted the correction to the affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case