Shobha Mahadev Shinde vs Balasaheb Ananta Jare 2 Advocate - Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar — 453/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200017242023
Next Hearing
31st July 2026
Filing Number
539/2023
Filing Date
04-08-2023
Registration No
453/2023
Registration Date
08-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shobha Mahadev Shinde
Adv. Shahaji Rajaram Kadam
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Ananta Jare 2 Advocate - Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar
Vishal Dattu Jare
Adv. Patil G.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Issues |
| 07-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 30-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 453/2023 Case: Shobha Mahadev Shinde v. Balasaheb Ananta Jare & Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar Court: Civil Court, Sangola, Maharashtra Date: 08/05/2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim injunction seeking to prevent respondents from obstructing her peaceful joint possession of disputed agricultural land in Khavasupur village. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience not favoring the petitioner, and no proof of irreparable harm without interim relief. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 453/2023 Case: Shobha Mahadev Shinde v. Balasaheb Ananta Jare & Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar Court: Civil Court, Sangola, Maharashtra Date: 08/05/2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim injunction seeking to prevent respondents from obstructing her peaceful joint possession of disputed agricultural land in Khavasupur village. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience not favoring the petitioner, and no proof of irreparable harm without interim relief. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts