Shobha Mahadev Shinde vs Balasaheb Ananta Jare 2 Advocate - Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar — 453/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 31-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200017242023

Filing Number

539/2023

Filing Date

04-Aug-2023

Registration No

453/2023

Registration Date

08-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,39

Petitioner(s)

1.Shobha Mahadev Shinde

Adv. Shahaji Rajaram Kadam

Respondent(s)

1.Balasaheb Ananta Jare 2 Advocate - Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar
2.Vishal Dattu Jare

Adv. Patil G.N.

Case History

31-Jul-2026

Next hearingPending
08-May-2026

Order on T.I.View PDF

Case Summary: 453/2023 Case: Shobha Mahadev Shinde v. Balasaheb Ananta Jare & Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar Court: Civil Court, Sangola, Maharashtra Date: 08/05/2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim injunction seeking to prevent respondents from obstructing her peaceful joint possession of disputed agricultural land in Khavasupur village. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience not favoring the petitioner, and no proof of irreparable harm without interim relief. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
08-May-2026

Issues

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
07-May-2026

Order on Exh

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
06-May-2026

Order on Exh

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
05-May-2026

Order on Exh

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
30-Apr-2026

Order on Exh

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
24-Apr-2026

Order on Exh

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
10-Apr-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
13-Mar-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
30-Jan-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
12-Dec-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
21-Nov-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
12-Sep-2025

Dismissal Order

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
20-Jun-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
28-Mar-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
21-Feb-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
24-Jan-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
22-Nov-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
19-Oct-2024

Order on ExhibitView PDF
19-Oct-2024

Order on ExhibitView PDF
19-Oct-2024

Order on ExhibitView PDF
19-Oct-2024

Depositing Amount

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
21-Sep-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
16-Aug-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
26-Jul-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
24-Jun-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
19-Apr-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
22-Mar-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
16-Feb-2024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
02-Feb-2024

W.S. and Say

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
05-Jan-2024

W.S. and Say

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
22-Dec-2023

W.S. and Say

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
01-Dec-2023

W.S. and Say

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
10-Nov-2023

W.S. and Say

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
03-Nov-2023

Awaiting Summons

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
13-Oct-2023

Awaiting Summons

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
29-Sep-2023

Awaiting Summons

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
08-Sep-2023

Awaiting Summons

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
25-Aug-2023

Argument on Exh.____Unready

C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
11-Aug-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
04-Aug-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 453/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 453/2023 Case: Shobha Mahadev Shinde v. Balasaheb Ananta Jare & Kulkarni Vaibhav Nandkumar Court: Civil Court, Sangola, Maharashtra Date: 08/05/2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's application for interim injunction seeking to prevent respondents from obstructing her peaceful joint possession of disputed agricultural land in Khavasupur village. The court found insufficient prima facie case, balance of convenience not favoring the petitioner, and no proof of irreparable harm without interim relief. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.