Sundarabai Mahadev Chavan vs Eknath Shivaji Pawar — 373/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200015252022
Filing Number
489/2022
Filing Date
06-Jul-2022
Registration No
373/2022
Registration Date
06-Jul-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sundarabai Mahadev Chavan
Adv. Deshmukh Yashvantrao Ganpatrao
-
2.Mahadev Dnyanu Chavan
Adv. Deshmukh Yashvantrao Ganpatrao
Respondent(s)
-
1.Eknath Shivaji Pawar
-
2.Kisan Mahadev Pawar
-
3.Siddheshwar Tukaram Pawar
-
4.Bharat Digambar Pawar
-
5.Pandurang Bhimrav Pawar
-
6.Sanjay Mahadev Bhagat
-
7.Namdev Mangina Gajge
-
8.Madhukar Krushna Pawar
-
9.Gramsevak, Watambare Grampanchayat
-
10.Lakshmi Shankar Gaikwad
-
11.Rohan Bantu Pawar
-
12.Popat Sitaram Pawar
-
13.Surekha Bantu Pawar
-
14.Rohit Bantu Pawar
-
15.Subhash Sitaram Pawar
-
16.Vitthal Tukaram Pawar
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
21-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
06-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
15-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
19-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
18-Oct-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
19-Sep-2025
Compliance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
24-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 373/2022 Outcome: The petition filed by Respondent No. 3 (Siddheshwar Tukaram Pawar) to set aside an ex parte order against him was allowed. The court set aside the ex parte order and permitted Respondent No. 3 to file his written statement in the original property dispute case concerning land plot no. 823/5, subject to payment of costs as directed in an earlier order dated 17. Key Points: The court found that while Respondent No. 3 delayed in appearing due to advanced age (84 years) and family circumstances, the principles of natural justice required that he be given an opportunity to present his defense in this property matter involving alleged encroachment and possession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jul-2025
Compliance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
28-Apr-2025
Steps
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
01-Mar-2025
Steps
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
23-Jan-2025
Steps
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
19-Dec-2024
Order on Exh
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
13-Nov-2024
Order on Exh
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
01-Oct-2024
Order on Exh
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
10-Sep-2024
Order on Exh
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
03-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
21-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
06-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
30-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
06-Feb-2024
Evidence
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
15-Dec-2023
Evidence
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
09-Nov-2023
Evidence
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
18-Sep-2023
Evidence
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
12-Jul-2023
Evidence
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
06-May-2023
Awaiting Summons
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
15-Mar-2023
Ex-Parte Order
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
16-Jan-2023
Ex-Parte Order
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
19-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
19-Sep-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
08-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 373/2022
Case Summary: 373/2022 Outcome: The petition filed by Respondent No. 3 (Siddheshwar Tukaram Pawar) to set aside an ex parte order against him was allowed. The court set aside the ex parte order and permitted Respondent No. 3 to file his written statement in the original property dispute case concerning land plot no. 823/5, subject to payment of costs as directed in an earlier order dated 17. Key Points: The court found that while Respondent No. 3 delayed in appearing due to advanced age (84 years) and family circumstances, the principles of natural justice required that he be given an opportunity to present his defense in this property matter involving alleged encroachment and possession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts