Kavita Balu @ Balaso Pukle vs Shalan Balu @ Balaso Pukle 5 Advocate - Inamdar M.S. — 387/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200014122023

Filing Number

462/2023

Filing Date

03-Jul-2023

Registration No

387/2023

Registration Date

10-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kavita Balu @ Balaso Pukle

    Adv. Gaikwad Vishvas Shivaji

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shalan Balu @ Balaso Pukle 5 Advocate - Inamdar M.S.

  2. 2.Tai Balu @ Balaso Pukle

  3. 3.Rajaram Balu @ Balaso Pukle

  4. 4.Sarjerav Balu @ Balaso Pukle

  5. 5.Jayvant Dhula Pukle

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  11. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 387/2023 In this partition suit, the court rejected the defendants' application to recall and re-examine the plaintiff as a witness under CPC Order XVIII, Rule 18. The defendants claimed ambiguities existed in the plaintiff's pleadings, prayers, and evidence that required clarification, but failed to specifically identify these ambiguities or demonstrate how recalling the witness would affect the case outcome. The court held that the power to recall witnesses applies only to clear genuine ambiguities arising during examination, not to fill evidentiary gaps, and cannot be exercised merely as a general procedural step. Application dismissed with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  15. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  16. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  17. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  18. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  21. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  22. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  23. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  24. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  25. 25-Jul-2024

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  26. 25-Jun-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  27. 05-Apr-2024

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  28. 28-Feb-2024

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  29. 30-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  30. 30-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  31. 30-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  32. 30-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  33. 30-Jan-2024

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  34. 22-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  35. 29-Nov-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  36. 08-Nov-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  37. 26-Oct-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  38. 09-Oct-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  39. 20-Sep-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  40. 24-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  41. 12-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 03-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 387/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 387/2023 In this partition suit, the court rejected the defendants' application to recall and re-examine the plaintiff as a witness under CPC Order XVIII, Rule 18. The defendants claimed ambiguities existed in the plaintiff's pleadings, prayers, and evidence that required clarification, but failed to specifically identify these ambiguities or demonstrate how recalling the witness would affect the case outcome. The court held that the power to recall witnesses applies only to clear genuine ambiguities arising during examination, not to fill evidentiary gaps, and cannot be exercised merely as a general procedural step. Application dismissed with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case