Dattu Mahadev Jare and 1 vs Duryodhan Krushna Bhosale and 3 Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra — 265/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,34,39. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200013402025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-07-2025
Filing Number
343/2025
Filing Date
04-07-2025
Registration No
265/2025
Registration Date
07-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattu Mahadev Jare and 1
Adv. Patil G.N.
Siddheshwar Mahadev Jare
Adv. Patil G.N.
Respondent(s)
Duryodhan Krushna Bhosale and 3 Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra
Sunil Shivaji Hagvane
Rajshree Ananda Bhosale
Anusaya Duryodhan Bhosale
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Ex-Parte Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 265/2025 Petition Granted The court granted the petition filed by Dattu Mahadev Jare and Siddheshwar Mahadev Jare against Duryodhan Krushna Bhosale and three others. The petitioners sought temporary injunction to prevent respondents from destroying sugarcane crops on their land (Plot 97, Moze Khavaspurta.Sangola, Solapur) and from trespassing on their cultivated area. The court found that petitioners had direct possession of the land with standing sugarcane crops and that respondents conducted a survey (P.R. 27332/2024) without proper prior notice to petitioners, violating natural justice principles. Accordingly, the court issued a temporary order restraining respondents from harvesting the crops or interfering with petitioners' quiet possession pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 265/2025 Petition Granted The court granted the petition filed by Dattu Mahadev Jare and Siddheshwar Mahadev Jare against Duryodhan Krushna Bhosale and three others. The petitioners sought temporary injunction to prevent respondents from destroying sugarcane crops on their land (Plot 97, Moze Khavaspurta.Sangola, Solapur) and from trespassing on their cultivated area. The court found that petitioners had direct possession of the land with standing sugarcane crops and that respondents conducted a survey (P.R. 27332/2024) without proper prior notice to petitioners, violating natural justice principles. Accordingly, the court issued a temporary order restraining respondents from harvesting the crops or interfering with petitioners' quiet possession pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts