Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale vs Ashok Nivrutti Kate — 367/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200013352023

Issues

Next Hearing

18th July 2026

e-Filing Number

26-06-2023

Filing Number

431/2023

Filing Date

27-06-2023

Registration No

367/2023

Registration Date

28-06-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale

Adv. KSHIRSAGAR DHANANJAY PANDURANG

Respondent(s)

Ashok Nivrutti Kate

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

05-05-2026

Issues

13-03-2026

Issues

12-02-2026

Issues

13-01-2026

Issues

21-11-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

17-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 367/2023 Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale v. Ashok Nivrutti Kate The court allowed the petition and set aside the default/non-appearance order against respondent Ashok Nivrutti Kate. The respondent's failure to appear within 30 days was attributed to legitimate circumstances including advanced age, health issues, and difficulties gathering required financial documents from banks. The court found that since the case involves immovable property and the respondent's valuable rights are at stake, procedural fairness required providing him an opportunity to file an appearance affidavit and present his case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 367/2023 Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale v. Ashok Nivrutti Kate The court allowed the petition and set aside the default/non-appearance order against respondent Ashok Nivrutti Kate. The respondent's failure to appear within 30 days was attributed to legitimate circumstances including advanced age, health issues, and difficulties gathering required financial documents from banks. The court found that since the case involves immovable property and the respondent's valuable rights are at stake, procedural fairness required providing him an opportunity to file an appearance affidavit and present his case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case