Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale vs Ashok Nivrutti Kate — 367/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200013352023
Next Hearing
18th July 2026
e-Filing Number
26-06-2023
Filing Number
431/2023
Filing Date
27-06-2023
Registration No
367/2023
Registration Date
28-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR DHANANJAY PANDURANG
Respondent(s)
Ashok Nivrutti Kate
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Issues |
| 12-02-2026 | Issues |
| 13-01-2026 | Issues |
| 21-11-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 367/2023 Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale v. Ashok Nivrutti Kate The court allowed the petition and set aside the default/non-appearance order against respondent Ashok Nivrutti Kate. The respondent's failure to appear within 30 days was attributed to legitimate circumstances including advanced age, health issues, and difficulties gathering required financial documents from banks. The court found that since the case involves immovable property and the respondent's valuable rights are at stake, procedural fairness required providing him an opportunity to file an appearance affidavit and present his case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 367/2023 Rajendra Tatoba Yelpale v. Ashok Nivrutti Kate The court allowed the petition and set aside the default/non-appearance order against respondent Ashok Nivrutti Kate. The respondent's failure to appear within 30 days was attributed to legitimate circumstances including advanced age, health issues, and difficulties gathering required financial documents from banks. The court found that since the case involves immovable property and the respondent's valuable rights are at stake, procedural fairness required providing him an opportunity to file an appearance affidavit and present his case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts