Pratibha Dadasaheb Vhalgal vs Maruti Digambar Sutar 7 Advocate - Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba — 319/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200012292023

Filing Number

390/2023

Filing Date

07-Jun-2023

Registration No

319/2023

Registration Date

14-Jun-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pratibha Dadasaheb Vhalgal

    Adv. Madane Shivaji D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maruti Digambar Sutar 7 Advocate - Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba

  2. 2.Popat Shrirang Vargar

  3. 3.Byaja Ananda Vargar

  4. 4.Ratanabai Shrirang Vargar

  5. 5.Jamanabai Shankar Vargar

  6. 6.Dinesh Shrirang Vargar

  7. 7.Nanaso Vishnu Pawar

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 04-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  8. 05-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  9. 13-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  10. 15-Mar-2025

    Issues

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  11. 05-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  12. 16-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  13. 14-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  14. 12-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  15. 03-Jul-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  16. 04-May-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 04-May-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 319/2023 Outcome: The court allowed the petition filed by Respondents 1 and 7 (Maruti Digambar Sutar and advocates Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba and others) and set aside the "Bina Kaifiyat" (without cause shown) order that had been issued against them. The court found that the respondents had not been given a proper opportunity to present their case and that procedural fairness required hearing both parties before making a final decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 04-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  19. 29-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  20. 19-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  21. 20-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  22. 05-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  23. 04-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  24. 28-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  25. 16-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 07-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 319/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 319/2023 Outcome: The court allowed the petition filed by Respondents 1 and 7 (Maruti Digambar Sutar and advocates Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba and others) and set aside the "Bina Kaifiyat" (without cause shown) order that had been issued against them. The court found that the respondents had not been given a proper opportunity to present their case and that procedural fairness required hearing both parties before making a final decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case