Pratibha Dadasaheb Vhalgal vs Maruti Digambar Sutar 7 Advocate - Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba — 319/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200012292023

Issues

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

390/2023

Filing Date

07-06-2023

Registration No

319/2023

Registration Date

14-06-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,39

Petitioner(s)

Pratibha Dadasaheb Vhalgal

Adv. Madane Shivaji D.

Respondent(s)

Maruti Digambar Sutar 7 Advocate - Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba

Popat Shrirang Vargar

Byaja Ananda Vargar

Ratanabai Shrirang Vargar

Jamanabai Shankar Vargar

Dinesh Shrirang Vargar

Nanaso Vishnu Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

18-04-2026

Issues

13-03-2026

Issues

17-01-2026

Issues

06-12-2025

Issues

07-11-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

04-05-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 319/2023 Outcome: The court allowed the petition filed by Respondents 1 and 7 (Maruti Digambar Sutar and advocates Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba and others) and set aside the "Bina Kaifiyat" (without cause shown) order that had been issued against them. The court found that the respondents had not been given a proper opportunity to present their case and that procedural fairness required hearing both parties before making a final decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 319/2023 Outcome: The court allowed the petition filed by Respondents 1 and 7 (Maruti Digambar Sutar and advocates Tande Dnyaneshwar Vithoba and others) and set aside the "Bina Kaifiyat" (without cause shown) order that had been issued against them. The court found that the respondents had not been given a proper opportunity to present their case and that procedural fairness required hearing both parties before making a final decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case