Dasharath Aappa Lendave vs Shivaji Aappa Lendave and — 225/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,22,37(2). Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200011722025

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-06-2025

Filing Number

290/2025

Filing Date

12-06-2025

Registration No

225/2025

Registration Date

16-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,22,37(2)

Petitioner(s)

Dasharath Aappa Lendave

Adv. GHADAGE DATTATRAYA BALASAHEB

Respondent(s)

Shivaji Aappa Lendave and

Pinku alies Rupali Shivaji Lendave

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

24-04-2026

Order on Exh

13-03-2026

Order on Exh

03-02-2026

Order on Exh

02-01-2026

Order on Exh

22-12-2025

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

17-06-2025
Order on T.I.
13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 225/2025 Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed against Respondent No. 2 on 21/08/2025. The respondent was absent from proceedings due to being out of station for work and not receiving documents timely. The court found that for a fair decision on the merits of a property dispute case, the respondent's appearance and affidavit on record were necessary to ensure natural justice. The court permitted the respondent to file a counter-affidavit after paying costs as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 225/2025 Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application to set aside an ex-parte order passed against Respondent No. 2 on 21/08/2025. The respondent was absent from proceedings due to being out of station for work and not receiving documents timely. The court found that for a fair decision on the merits of a property dispute case, the respondent's appearance and affidavit on record were necessary to ensure natural justice. The court permitted the respondent to file a counter-affidavit after paying costs as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case