Brahmdev Sadashiv Babar vs Hanmant Bhimrao Kate Advocate - Kasabe M. V. — 297/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200010172024
Next Hearing
24th July 2026
e-Filing Number
21-06-2024
Filing Number
364/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
297/2024
Registration Date
27-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Brahmdev Sadashiv Babar
Adv. Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
Hanmant Bhimrao Kate Advocate - Kasabe M. V.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Issues |
| 23-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 20-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 08-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 297/2024 Petitioner (Wadi): Brahmdev Sadashiv Babar Respondent (Pratiawadi): Hanmant Bhimrao Kate Advocate Outcome: The petitioner's application for interim injunction (Notice 5) was ALLOWED. The court issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting the respondent from obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property (0.80 acres in Ligadewadi, Sangola taluk) or interfering with it until final judgment. The respondent's counter-application for interim relief (Notice 41) was DISMISSED. The petitioner's application for interim relief (Notice 26) was absorbed into Notice 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 297/2024 Petitioner (Wadi): Brahmdev Sadashiv Babar Respondent (Pratiawadi): Hanmant Bhimrao Kate Advocate Outcome: The petitioner's application for interim injunction (Notice 5) was ALLOWED. The court issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting the respondent from obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property (0.80 acres in Ligadewadi, Sangola taluk) or interfering with it until final judgment. The respondent's counter-application for interim relief (Notice 41) was DISMISSED. The petitioner's application for interim relief (Notice 26) was absorbed into Notice 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts