State of Maharashtra vs Desh Dnyanu Aivle — 487/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200009682025
e-Filing Number
06-05-2025
Filing Number
731/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
487/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
121
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Desh Dnyanu Aivle
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 29-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Desh Dnyanu Aiwale of offences under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, citing lack of progress since institution, repeated failure to secure the accused's presence, and absence of the required Chemical Examiner's report needed to establish the substance as prohibited. All bail bonds were cancelled and any outstanding warrants were recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Desh Dnyanu Aiwale of offences under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, citing lack of progress since institution, repeated failure to secure the accused's presence, and absence of the required Chemical Examiner's report needed to establish the substance as prohibited. All bail bonds were cancelled and any outstanding warrants were recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts