State of Maharashtra vs Desh Dnyanu Aivle — 487/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200009682025

e-Filing Number

06-05-2025

Filing Number

731/2025

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

487/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

121

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Desh Dnyanu Aivle

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Desh Dnyanu Aiwale of offences under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, citing lack of progress since institution, repeated failure to secure the accused's presence, and absence of the required Chemical Examiner's report needed to establish the substance as prohibited. All bail bonds were cancelled and any outstanding warrants were recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 19-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 29-May-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  8. 15-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 487/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Desh Dnyanu Aiwale of offences under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, citing lack of progress since institution, repeated failure to secure the accused's presence, and absence of the required Chemical Examiner's report needed to establish the substance as prohibited. All bail bonds were cancelled and any outstanding warrants were recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case