State of Maharashtra vs Shankar Dagadu Shinde Advocate - Suryawanshi Ranjit Dattatray — 168/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 314,324,323,504,506,143,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200009212022

Filing Number

628/2022

Filing Date

25-Apr-2022

Registration No

168/2022

Registration Date

25-Apr-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 314,324,323,504,506,143,147,148,149

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

1.Shankar Dagadu Shinde Advocate - Suryawanshi Ranjit Dattatray
2.Sanjay Shankar Shinde
3.Maruti Shankar Shinde
4.Raosaheb Maruti Shinde
5.Lakshman Maruti Shinde
6.Tayappa Bapu Shinde

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
30-Mar-2026

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shankar Dagadu Shinde & Others (RCC 168/2022) Court Decision: All six accused persons were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 323, 341, 504 & 506 read with 149. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to: material contradictions in witness testimonies (particularly regarding the relationship of the daughter-in-law and the sequence of events), absence of independent witnesses despite the incident occurring on a crowded road, panch witnesses not supporting the case, medical evidence showing injuries could result from motorcycle falls, and unexplained 5-day delay in lodging the FIR. The court emphasized that all prosecution witnesses were related to the informant and lacked corroboration from neutral sources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
30-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
25-Mar-2026

Arguments

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
17-Mar-2026

Arguments

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
16-Mar-2026

Arguments

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
13-Mar-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
12-Mar-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
02-Mar-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
26-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
23-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
13-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
09-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
07-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
04-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
20-Jan-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
09-Jan-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
05-Dec-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
10-Nov-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
22-Sep-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
12-Aug-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
02-Jul-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
07-May-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
13-Mar-2025

Evidence Part Heard

IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
17-Jan-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
24-Dec-2024

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
18-Oct-2024

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
09-Sep-2024

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
05-Aug-2024

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
15-Jun-2024

Evidence

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
20-Mar-2024

Evidence

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
13-Feb-2024

Evidence

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
15-Dec-2023

Evidence

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
25-Sep-2023

Evidence

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
24-Aug-2023

Evidence

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
12-Jun-2023

Hearing

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
11-Apr-2023

Hearing

Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
16-Feb-2023

Hearing

IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
02-Jan-2023

Hearing

IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
31-Oct-2022

Awaiting Summons

IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
06-Aug-2022

Awaiting Summons

IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
02-May-2022

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Apr-2022

Case filed

Registration No. 168/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shankar Dagadu Shinde & Others (RCC 168/2022) Court Decision: All six accused persons were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 323, 341, 504 & 506 read with 149. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to: material contradictions in witness testimonies (particularly regarding the relationship of the daughter-in-law and the sequence of events), absence of independent witnesses despite the incident occurring on a crowded road, panch witnesses not supporting the case, medical evidence showing injuries could result from motorcycle falls, and unexplained 5-day delay in lodging the FIR. The court emphasized that all prosecution witnesses were related to the informant and lacked corroboration from neutral sources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.