State of Maharashtra vs Charan Bhataji Shinde — 445/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200008612025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-04-2025

Filing Number

656/2025

Filing Date

17-04-2025

Registration No

445/2025

Registration Date

17-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Charan Bhataji Shinde

Hearing History

Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

17-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

19-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court discharged accused Charan Bhataji Shinde of offences under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, citing lack of progress since institution, prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities, and absence of the critical Chemical Analysis report necessary to establish whether the seized substance was prohibited. Bail bonds were cancelled and any issued warrant was recalled without execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Charan Bhataji Shinde of offences under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, citing lack of progress since institution, prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities, and absence of the critical Chemical Analysis report necessary to establish whether the seized substance was prohibited. Bail bonds were cancelled and any issued warrant was recalled without execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case