State of Maharashtra Excies vs Ramchandra Madhukar Galve — 420/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200008142025

Filing Number

623/2025

Filing Date

04-Apr-2025

Registration No

420/2025

Registration Date

04-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

413

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Excies

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramchandra Madhukar Galve

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the prosecution case against Ramchandra Madhukar Galave under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to lack of progress and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities. The critical missing element was the Chemical Analyst (C.A.) report, which is essential to establish whether seized substances were prohibited, and its absence undermined the case. The court discharged the accused, canceled bail bonds, recalled any warrants, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 10-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 28-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 420/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the prosecution case against Ramchandra Madhukar Galave under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to lack of progress and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities. The critical missing element was the Chemical Analyst (C.A.) report, which is essential to establish whether seized substances were prohibited, and its absence undermined the case. The court discharged the accused, canceled bail bonds, recalled any warrants, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case