State of Maharashtra Excies vs Ramchandra Madhukar Galve — 420/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200008142025

Case disposed

Filing Number

623/2025

Filing Date

04-04-2025

Registration No

420/2025

Registration Date

04-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

413

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Excies

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Ramchandra Madhukar Galve

Hearing History

Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

10-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

28-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court dismissed the prosecution case against Ramchandra Madhukar Galave under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to lack of progress and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities. The critical missing element was the Chemical Analyst (C.A.) report, which is essential to establish whether seized substances were prohibited, and its absence undermined the case. The court discharged the accused, canceled bail bonds, recalled any warrants, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the prosecution case against Ramchandra Madhukar Galave under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to lack of progress and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities. The critical missing element was the Chemical Analyst (C.A.) report, which is essential to establish whether seized substances were prohibited, and its absence undermined the case. The court discharged the accused, canceled bail bonds, recalled any warrants, and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case