State of Maharashtra Excies vs Charnu Bharji Shinde — 416/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200008102025
Filing Number
619/2025
Filing Date
04-04-2025
Registration No
416/2025
Registration Date
04-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
429
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Excies
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Charnu Bharji Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 01-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 25-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 416/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Charanu Bharaji Shinde of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The judge found the case had stalled due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report necessary to prove the seized substance was prohibited, rendering continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 416/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Charanu Bharaji Shinde of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The judge found the case had stalled due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report necessary to prove the seized substance was prohibited, rendering continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts