State of Maharashtra Excies vs Charnu Bharji Shinde — 416/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200008102025

Filing Number

619/2025

Filing Date

04-Apr-2025

Registration No

416/2025

Registration Date

04-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

429

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Excies

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Charnu Bharji Shinde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 416/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Charanu Bharaji Shinde of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The judge found the case had stalled due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report necessary to prove the seized substance was prohibited, rendering continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 01-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 416/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 416/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Charanu Bharaji Shinde of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The judge found the case had stalled due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report necessary to prove the seized substance was prohibited, rendering continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case