State of Maharashtra Excies vs Charnu Bharji Shinde — 416/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200008102025

Case disposed

Filing Number

619/2025

Filing Date

04-04-2025

Registration No

416/2025

Registration Date

04-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

429

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Excies

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Charnu Bharji Shinde

Hearing History

Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

10-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

01-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

25-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 416/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Charanu Bharaji Shinde of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The judge found the case had stalled due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report necessary to prove the seized substance was prohibited, rendering continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 416/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Charanu Bharaji Shinde of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The judge found the case had stalled due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report necessary to prove the seized substance was prohibited, rendering continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case