State of Maharashtra vs Jotiram Pandurang Tone — 368/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200007422025
e-Filing Number
18-03-2025
Filing Number
559/2025
Filing Date
28-03-2025
Registration No
368/2025
Registration Date
28-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Jotiram Pandurang Tone
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 05-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jotiram Pandurang Tone (S.T.C. 368/2025) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, stopping proceedings in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(ई) case. The court found no progress since institution due to the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the Chemical Analyst report—critical for determining whether seized substance was prohibited. The court deemed continued proceedings purposeless and ordered discharge, cancellation of bail bonds, and recall of any outstanding warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jotiram Pandurang Tone (S.T.C. 368/2025) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, stopping proceedings in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(ई) case. The court found no progress since institution due to the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and failure to file the Chemical Analyst report—critical for determining whether seized substance was prohibited. The court deemed continued proceedings purposeless and ordered discharge, cancellation of bail bonds, and recall of any outstanding warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts