State of Maharashtra vs Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare Advocate - Ligade Dhananjay Pradip — 246/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200006462025
e-Filing Number
29-08-2023
Filing Number
484/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
246/2025
Registration Date
19-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
609
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare Advocate - Ligade Dhananjay Pradip
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 246/2025 The court acquitted Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor sale. The prosecution relied solely on testimony from a single panchnama witness who failed to corroborate the prosecution's case and provided contradictory statements. The court found the prosecution failed to produce sufficient evidence, including the required chemical analysis report, and other material witnesses despite multiple summons. Applying the benefit of doubt principle in criminal law, the court acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 246/2025 The court acquitted Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor sale. The prosecution relied solely on testimony from a single panchnama witness who failed to corroborate the prosecution's case and provided contradictory statements. The court found the prosecution failed to produce sufficient evidence, including the required chemical analysis report, and other material witnesses despite multiple summons. Applying the benefit of doubt principle in criminal law, the court acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts