State of Maharashtra vs Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare Advocate - Ligade Dhananjay Pradip — 246/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200006462025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-08-2023

Filing Number

484/2025

Filing Date

19-03-2025

Registration No

246/2025

Registration Date

19-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

609

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare Advocate - Ligade Dhananjay Pradip

Hearing History

Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Arguments

24-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Case 246/2025 The court acquitted Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor sale. The prosecution relied solely on testimony from a single panchnama witness who failed to corroborate the prosecution's case and provided contradictory statements. The court found the prosecution failed to produce sufficient evidence, including the required chemical analysis report, and other material witnesses despite multiple summons. Applying the benefit of doubt principle in criminal law, the court acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 246/2025 The court acquitted Dhanaji Dattatray Waghmare of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor sale. The prosecution relied solely on testimony from a single panchnama witness who failed to corroborate the prosecution's case and provided contradictory statements. The court found the prosecution failed to produce sufficient evidence, including the required chemical analysis report, and other material witnesses despite multiple summons. Applying the benefit of doubt principle in criminal law, the court acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case