State of Maharashtra vs Dildar Aabasaheb Hambirrao — 236/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200006202025
e-Filing Number
18-03-2025
Filing Number
465/2025
Filing Date
18-03-2025
Registration No
236/2025
Registration Date
18-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
773
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Dildar Aabasaheb Hambirrao
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-03-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 236/2025 Summary: The court stopped proceedings and discharged the accused Dildar Abasaheb Hambirrao of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing lack of progress since case institution. Key reasons included the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities and the absence of a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report—essential to establish whether seized substance was prohibited—both before and after the charge-sheet filing. All bail bonds were canceled and any issued warrants recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 236/2025 Summary: The court stopped proceedings and discharged the accused Dildar Abasaheb Hambirrao of charges under Section 65(ई) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing lack of progress since case institution. Key reasons included the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities and the absence of a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report—essential to establish whether seized substance was prohibited—both before and after the charge-sheet filing. All bail bonds were canceled and any issued warrants recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts