Sunil Ramhari Danake vs Sachin Ramhari Danake and — 106/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200004832026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
154/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
106/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Ramhari Danake
Adv. DHALE MARUTI NAMDEO
Respondent(s)
Sachin Ramhari Danake and
Sunita Ranjitsinh Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 106/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalat panel at Sangola resolved the dispute between Sunil Ramhari Danake (petitioner) and Sachin Ramhari Danake and Sunita Ranjitsinh Patil (respondents) through settlement. Both parties voluntarily agreed to the compromise terms filed as Exhibit No. 11, and the court approved the settlement, directing that an award be drawn accordingly, court fees refunded, and each party bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 106/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalat panel at Sangola resolved the dispute between Sunil Ramhari Danake (petitioner) and Sachin Ramhari Danake and Sunita Ranjitsinh Patil (respondents) through settlement. Both parties voluntarily agreed to the compromise terms filed as Exhibit No. 11, and the court approved the settlement, directing that an award be drawn accordingly, court fees refunded, and each party bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts