Pandurang Narayan Ghogare vs Narayan Dada Ghogare and — 103/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200004802026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

151/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandurang Narayan Ghogare

    Adv. LUBAL SHIVAJI DNYANU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Dada Ghogare and

  2. 2.Nilabai Narayan Ghogare

  3. 3.Vitthal Narayan Ghogare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Pandurang Narayan Ghogare v. Narayan Dada Ghogare & Ors. (R.C.S. 103/2026) The National Lok-Adalat panel at Sangola, Solapur, ordered settlement of the suit between Pandurang Narayan Ghogare (petitioner) and Narayan Dada Ghogare, Nilabai Narayan Ghogare, and Vitthal Narayan Ghogare (respondents) based on a compromise agreement voluntarily admitted by all parties. The court directed an award be drawn up per the compromise terms (Exh. No. 12), refunded the court fee, and directed parties to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pandurang Narayan Ghogare v. Narayan Dada Ghogare & Ors. (R.C.S. 103/2026) The National Lok-Adalat panel at Sangola, Solapur, ordered settlement of the suit between Pandurang Narayan Ghogare (petitioner) and Narayan Dada Ghogare, Nilabai Narayan Ghogare, and Vitthal Narayan Ghogare (respondents) based on a compromise agreement voluntarily admitted by all parties. The court directed an award be drawn up per the compromise terms (Exh. No. 12), refunded the court fee, and directed parties to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case