Mayuresh Madhukar Mali vs Madhukkar Sadashiv Mali and — 101/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200004782026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

149/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mayuresh Madhukar Mali

    Adv. BHASME SHIVNATH SHRIDHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhukkar Sadashiv Mali and

  2. 2.Sangita Madhukar Mali

  3. 3.Vaishnavi Madhukar Mali

  4. 4.Kisan sadashiv Mali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 101/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Sangola resolved the dispute between Mayuresh Madhukar Mali (petitioner) and Madhukkar Sadashiv Mali, Sangita Madhukar Mali, and Vaishnavi Madhukar Mali (respondents) through settlement under Rule 10. Both parties submitted a joint compromise proposal which was accepted by the court, dividing the disputed properties between the parties according to agreed terms. The court approved the settlement and directed preparation of an award accordingly, with court fees to be returned as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 101/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Sangola resolved the dispute between Mayuresh Madhukar Mali (petitioner) and Madhukkar Sadashiv Mali, Sangita Madhukar Mali, and Vaishnavi Madhukar Mali (respondents) through settlement under Rule 10. Both parties submitted a joint compromise proposal which was accepted by the court, dividing the disputed properties between the parties according to agreed terms. The court approved the settlement and directed preparation of an award accordingly, with court fees to be returned as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case