Pradip Vilas Kambale vs State of Maharashtra — 77/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO200004772026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

351/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

77/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

136

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Vilas Kambale

    Adv. LIGADE DHANANJAY PRADIP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Pradip Vilas Kamble v. State of Maharashtra (C.R.M.A. 77/2026) The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle. The applicant, who purchased the vehicle on 10/11/2025 from the original owner through notarized documents, sought release from police custody where it was seized in connection with an alleged sand theft case. The court found that the applicant demonstrated ownership through Aadhar cards, notarized documents, and FIR copies, and held that keeping the vehicle idle at the police station served no purpose and risked deterioration. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat), the court ordered release on execution of a ₹4 lakh indemnity bond with conditions: no sale/transfer without court permission, no alteration of vehicle color/nature, production on demand, and mandatory photographic documentation and panchnama before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pradip Vilas Kamble v. State of Maharashtra (C.R.M.A. 77/2026) The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle. The applicant, who purchased the vehicle on 10/11/2025 from the original owner through notarized documents, sought release from police custody where it was seized in connection with an alleged sand theft case. The court found that the applicant demonstrated ownership through Aadhar cards, notarized documents, and FIR copies, and held that keeping the vehicle idle at the police station served no purpose and risked deterioration. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat), the court ordered release on execution of a ₹4 lakh indemnity bond with conditions: no sale/transfer without court permission, no alteration of vehicle color/nature, production on demand, and mandatory photographic documentation and panchnama before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case