Pradip Vilas Kambale vs State of Maharashtra — 77/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO200004772026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
351/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
77/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pradip Vilas Kambale
Adv. LIGADE DHANANJAY PRADIP
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 20-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Pradip Vilas Kamble v. State of Maharashtra (C.R.M.A. 77/2026) The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle. The applicant, who purchased the vehicle on 10/11/2025 from the original owner through notarized documents, sought release from police custody where it was seized in connection with an alleged sand theft case. The court found that the applicant demonstrated ownership through Aadhar cards, notarized documents, and FIR copies, and held that keeping the vehicle idle at the police station served no purpose and risked deterioration. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat), the court ordered release on execution of a ₹4 lakh indemnity bond with conditions: no sale/transfer without court permission, no alteration of vehicle color/nature, production on demand, and mandatory photographic documentation and panchnama before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Pradip Vilas Kamble v. State of Maharashtra (C.R.M.A. 77/2026) The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle. The applicant, who purchased the vehicle on 10/11/2025 from the original owner through notarized documents, sought release from police custody where it was seized in connection with an alleged sand theft case. The court found that the applicant demonstrated ownership through Aadhar cards, notarized documents, and FIR copies, and held that keeping the vehicle idle at the police station served no purpose and risked deterioration. Relying on Supreme Court precedent (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat), the court ordered release on execution of a ₹4 lakh indemnity bond with conditions: no sale/transfer without court permission, no alteration of vehicle color/nature, production on demand, and mandatory photographic documentation and panchnama before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts