Rohit Shivaji Raut vs State of Maharashtra — 63/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO200003782026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
289/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohit Shivaji Raut
Adv. DESHMUKH PRASAD DATTATRAY
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Disposed
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 27-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Rohit Shivaji Raut v. State of Maharashtra (63/2026) The court allowed Rohit Shivaji Raut's application for interim custody of his seized vehicle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Judicial Magistrate held that as the vehicle was seized by police in a criminal case under Section 303(2) BNS 2023, only a Magistrate has jurisdiction to order its release, relying on High Court precedent. The court granted custody upon payment of a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions including preservation of the vehicle, submission for investigation when required, and prohibition on its use for any illegal purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Rohit Shivaji Raut v. State of Maharashtra (63/2026) The court allowed Rohit Shivaji Raut's application for interim custody of his seized vehicle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Judicial Magistrate held that as the vehicle was seized by police in a criminal case under Section 303(2) BNS 2023, only a Magistrate has jurisdiction to order its release, relying on High Court precedent. The court granted custody upon payment of a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions including preservation of the vehicle, submission for investigation when required, and prohibition on its use for any illegal purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts