Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik vs State of Maharashtra — 54/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO200003352026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

254/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik

    Adv. kamale Eknath Dattatraya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik v. State of Maharashtra (54/2026) The Sangola Court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized vehicle (KA-23-A-9905) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the petitioner established ownership through registration documents and Aadhar card, and that no third party claimed ownership rights. The court reasoned that retaining the vehicle at the police station served no purpose while investigation was ongoing, citing Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be kept at police stations indefinitely. The vehicle was released upon a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, illegal use, or transfer without court permission, and requiring the petitioner to maintain it and produce it as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  12. 21-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik v. State of Maharashtra (54/2026) The Sangola Court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized vehicle (KA-23-A-9905) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the petitioner established ownership through registration documents and Aadhar card, and that no third party claimed ownership rights. The court reasoned that retaining the vehicle at the police station served no purpose while investigation was ongoing, citing Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be kept at police stations indefinitely. The vehicle was released upon a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, illegal use, or transfer without court permission, and requiring the petitioner to maintain it and produce it as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case