Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik vs State of Maharashtra — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO200003352026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
254/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik
Adv. kamale Eknath Dattatraya
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 02-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik v. State of Maharashtra (54/2026) The Sangola Court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized vehicle (KA-23-A-9905) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the petitioner established ownership through registration documents and Aadhar card, and that no third party claimed ownership rights. The court reasoned that retaining the vehicle at the police station served no purpose while investigation was ongoing, citing Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be kept at police stations indefinitely. The vehicle was released upon a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, illegal use, or transfer without court permission, and requiring the petitioner to maintain it and produce it as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Chandrashekhar Mauti Janwad Alias Naik v. State of Maharashtra (54/2026) The Sangola Court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized vehicle (KA-23-A-9905) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the petitioner established ownership through registration documents and Aadhar card, and that no third party claimed ownership rights. The court reasoned that retaining the vehicle at the police station served no purpose while investigation was ongoing, citing Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be kept at police stations indefinitely. The vehicle was released upon a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, illegal use, or transfer without court permission, and requiring the petitioner to maintain it and produce it as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts