Audumber Shankar Sapate vs Bhaskar Shankar Sapate and — 62/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200003312026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

101/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Audumber Shankar Sapate

    Adv. BANKAR BHARAT UTTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhaskar Shankar Sapate and

  2. 2.Nirmala Pundalik Dounde

  3. 3.Mangal Parbhakar Babar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 62/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Sangola resolved the property dispute between Audumber Shankar Sapate and respondents Bhaskar Shankar Sapate, Nirmala Pundalik Dounde, and Mangal Parbhakar Babar through a settlement under Rule 10. The court approved the compromise settlement wherein the parties mutually agreed to partition shared properties and determine respective shares. An award was ordered to be prepared based on the agreed settlement terms, and court fees were directed to be returned as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 62/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Sangola resolved the property dispute between Audumber Shankar Sapate and respondents Bhaskar Shankar Sapate, Nirmala Pundalik Dounde, and Mangal Parbhakar Babar through a settlement under Rule 10. The court approved the compromise settlement wherein the parties mutually agreed to partition shared properties and determine respective shares. An award was ordered to be prepared based on the agreed settlement terms, and court fees were directed to be returned as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case