Jagannath Machindra Bhosale vs Shivaji Machindra Bhosale — 74/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200002312025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2025

Filing Number

91/2025

Filing Date

10-02-2025

Registration No

74/2025

Registration Date

10-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 33

Petitioner(s)

Jagannath Machindra Bhosale

Adv. DESHMUKH SACHIN LAXMAN

Respondent(s)

Shivaji Machindra Bhosale

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

22-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

22-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

03-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 74/2025 Jagannath Machindra Bhosale v. Shivaji Machindra Bhosale Jagannath Bhosale sought an interim relief petition regarding agricultural land (Plot No. 1078/1) in Sangola, alleging that Shivaji Bhosale was unlawfully obstructing his peaceful possession and constructing on the property. The court partially granted Bhosale's petition and issued an order directing both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the disputed land until the final judgment in the underlying suit. The respondent was restrained from further construction during the pendency of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 74/2025 Jagannath Machindra Bhosale v. Shivaji Machindra Bhosale Jagannath Bhosale sought an interim relief petition regarding agricultural land (Plot No. 1078/1) in Sangola, alleging that Shivaji Bhosale was unlawfully obstructing his peaceful possession and constructing on the property. The court partially granted Bhosale's petition and issued an order directing both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the disputed land until the final judgment in the underlying suit. The respondent was restrained from further construction during the pendency of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case