Sangita Sukhadev Dorle vs Indabai Amrut Dorle and 5 Advocate - Rodage Sambhajirao S — 39/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200001852026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sangita Sukhadev Dorle
Adv. Dhere Sachin Jalindar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Indabai Amrut Dorle and 5 Advocate - Rodage Sambhajirao S
-
2.Vikas Amrut Dorle
-
3.Aappaso Amrut Dorle
-
4.Laxman Bhimrao Sope
-
5.Pawan Vasant Nikam
-
6.Pro Zil Green Power Nine private limited Company Through Chetan Rakesh Meharotra
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 39/2026 Outcome: The application for stay of suit under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found that defendants failed to establish that the matter in issue in the present suit (perpetual injunction regarding block No. 183) was directly and substantially identical to the previously instituted suit (RCS No. 470/2024 for partition involving 11 properties and 79 defendants). The court noted that since defendants had not filed written statements in either suit, pleadings were incomplete and issues had not crystallized, making it impossible to meaningfully compare the disputes at this premature stage. Costs awarded to the plaintiff in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Order on Exh
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
08-May-2026
Order on Exh
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
30-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
27-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
22-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
17-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
13-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
08-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
04-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
18-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
03-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2026
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 39/2026 Outcome: The application for stay of suit under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found that defendants failed to establish that the matter in issue in the present suit (perpetual injunction regarding block No. 183) was directly and substantially identical to the previously instituted suit (RCS No. 470/2024 for partition involving 11 properties and 79 defendants). The court noted that since defendants had not filed written statements in either suit, pleadings were incomplete and issues had not crystallized, making it impossible to meaningfully compare the disputes at this premature stage. Costs awarded to the plaintiff in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts