Sangita Sukhadev Dorle vs Indabai Amrut Dorle and 5 Advocate - Rodage Sambhajirao S — 39/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Order on Exh Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200001852026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

49/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sangita Sukhadev Dorle

    Adv. Dhere Sachin Jalindar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Indabai Amrut Dorle and 5 Advocate - Rodage Sambhajirao S

  2. 2.Vikas Amrut Dorle

  3. 3.Aappaso Amrut Dorle

  4. 4.Laxman Bhimrao Sope

  5. 5.Pawan Vasant Nikam

  6. 6.Pro Zil Green Power Nine private limited Company Through Chetan Rakesh Meharotra

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 39/2026 Outcome: The application for stay of suit under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found that defendants failed to establish that the matter in issue in the present suit (perpetual injunction regarding block No. 183) was directly and substantially identical to the previously instituted suit (RCS No. 470/2024 for partition involving 11 properties and 79 defendants). The court noted that since defendants had not filed written statements in either suit, pleadings were incomplete and issues had not crystallized, making it impossible to meaningfully compare the disputes at this premature stage. Costs awarded to the plaintiff in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  4. 08-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  9. 13-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  10. 08-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  12. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  13. 18-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  14. 03-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  15. 03-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  16. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 39/2026 Outcome: The application for stay of suit under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found that defendants failed to establish that the matter in issue in the present suit (perpetual injunction regarding block No. 183) was directly and substantially identical to the previously instituted suit (RCS No. 470/2024 for partition involving 11 properties and 79 defendants). The court noted that since defendants had not filed written statements in either suit, pleadings were incomplete and issues had not crystallized, making it impossible to meaningfully compare the disputes at this premature stage. Costs awarded to the plaintiff in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case