State of Maharashtra vs Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad and 3 Advocate - Pukale Mahadeo Baban — 41/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,323,506,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200001682024
Filing Number
130/2024
Filing Date
30-01-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
30-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad and 3 Advocate - Pukale Mahadeo Baban
Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad
Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad
Mayuri Satyavan Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 41/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Sangola, Solapur acquitted all three defendants—Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad, Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad, and Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad—on March 18, 2026, under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully entered the complainant's home, committed assault, abused, or intimidated the complainant as alleged. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) provided inconsistent testimony, couldn't recall crucial details about the alleged incident, and failed to support the charges. Additionally, evidence of an out-of-court settlement between the accused and complainant undermined the prosecution case, rendering the charges unproven beyond suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 41/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Sangola, Solapur acquitted all three defendants—Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad, Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad, and Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad—on March 18, 2026, under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully entered the complainant's home, committed assault, abused, or intimidated the complainant as alleged. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) provided inconsistent testimony, couldn't recall crucial details about the alleged incident, and failed to support the charges. Additionally, evidence of an out-of-court settlement between the accused and complainant undermined the prosecution case, rendering the charges unproven beyond suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts