State of Maharashtra vs Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad and 3 Advocate - Pukale Mahadeo Baban — 41/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,323,506,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO200001682024

Case disposed

Filing Number

130/2024

Filing Date

30-01-2024

Registration No

41/2024

Registration Date

30-01-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Sangola Police Station.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 452,323,506,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad and 3 Advocate - Pukale Mahadeo Baban

Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad

Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad

Mayuri Satyavan Gaikwad

Hearing History

Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Arguments

07-03-2026

Arguments

21-02-2026

Arguments

02-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 41/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Sangola, Solapur acquitted all three defendants—Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad, Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad, and Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad—on March 18, 2026, under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully entered the complainant's home, committed assault, abused, or intimidated the complainant as alleged. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) provided inconsistent testimony, couldn't recall crucial details about the alleged incident, and failed to support the charges. Additionally, evidence of an out-of-court settlement between the accused and complainant undermined the prosecution case, rendering the charges unproven beyond suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 41/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Sangola, Solapur acquitted all three defendants—Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad, Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad, and Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad—on March 18, 2026, under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully entered the complainant's home, committed assault, abused, or intimidated the complainant as alleged. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) provided inconsistent testimony, couldn't recall crucial details about the alleged incident, and failed to support the charges. Additionally, evidence of an out-of-court settlement between the accused and complainant undermined the prosecution case, rendering the charges unproven beyond suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case