State of Maharashtra vs Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad and 3 Advocate - Pukale Mahadeo Baban — 41/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,323,506,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO200001682024
Filing Number
130/2024
Filing Date
30-Jan-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
30-Jan-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Sangola Police Station.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad and 3 Advocate - Pukale Mahadeo Baban
-
2.Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad
-
3.Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad
-
4.Mayuri Satyavan Gaikwad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 41/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Sangola, Solapur acquitted all three defendants—Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad, Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad, and Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad—on March 18, 2026, under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully entered the complainant's home, committed assault, abused, or intimidated the complainant as alleged. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) provided inconsistent testimony, couldn't recall crucial details about the alleged incident, and failed to support the charges. Additionally, evidence of an out-of-court settlement between the accused and complainant undermined the prosecution case, rendering the charges unproven beyond suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
15-Oct-2025
Charge
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
09-Sep-2025
Charge
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
06-Aug-2025
Filing of Surety
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
07-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
17-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
15-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
-
08-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
30-May-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.
-
15-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2024
Case Summary: 41/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Sangola, Solapur acquitted all three defendants—Satyavan Raosaheb Gaikwad, Sunita Satyavan Gaikwad, and Aniket Satyavan Gaikwad—on March 18, 2026, under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully entered the complainant's home, committed assault, abused, or intimidated the complainant as alleged. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) provided inconsistent testimony, couldn't recall crucial details about the alleged incident, and failed to support the charges. Additionally, evidence of an out-of-court settlement between the accused and complainant undermined the prosecution case, rendering the charges unproven beyond suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts