Bharat Haridas Gaikwad vs Popat Pandharinath Gangane and 40 Advocate - Inamdar M.S. — 29/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200001582024

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

29-01-2024

Filing Number

44/2024

Filing Date

29-01-2024

Registration No

29/2024

Registration Date

30-01-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Bharat Haridas Gaikwad

Adv. Rajaram Kedar

Respondent(s)

Popat Pandharinath Gangane and 40 Advocate - Inamdar M.S.

Santaji Shamrao Gaikwad

Tanaji Shamrao Gaikwad

Sitaram Maruti Shinde

Raosaheb Dnyanu Kharat

Anil Shankar Patil

Santosh Shankar Patil

Vikas Shankar Patil

Ashwini Shankar Patil

Mangal Shankar Patil

Popat Bhauso Salunkhe

Mangal Siddheshwar Ingole

Phulabai Bhauso Salunkhe

Surekha Bhauso Salunkhe

Gorakh Bhauso Salunkhe

Panda Khema Gangane

Sadashiv Shivaji Gaikwad

Surekha Tanaji Gaikwad

Vikas Bapu Yadav

Sachin Vilas Sawant

Ranjana Vilas Sawant

Tukaram Appasaheb Mane

Sunil Premsing Chavan

Kailas Premsing Chavan

Nanda Vinod Parmal

Kapil Anil Chavan

Pravin Anil Chavan

Karishma Mithun Shelake

Ganesh Vilas Gaikwad

Sharad Sitaram Jadhav

Nanaso Sitaram Jadhav

Shashikant Ganpati Gaikwad

Punam Pradip Raut

Jitesh Ashok Chavan

Jagannath Jaywant Gaikwad

Suman Dattatrya Tad

Yashraje Sarvjanik Wachanalaya

Suresh Haridas Gaikwad

Prakash Haridas Gaikwad

Balaso Haridas Gaikwad

Ramesh Haridas Gaikwad

Hearing History

Judge: 6-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Sangola.

07-05-2026

Order on Exh

27-04-2026

Order on Exh

06-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Order on Exh

09-02-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

22-09-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 29/2024 Outcome: The petition (Misc. Application No. 20) filed by petitioner Bharat Haridas Gaikwad was granted. Respondent No. 1 (Popat Pandharinath Gangane) was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs, and the procedural delay in filing the reply was condoned. The court set aside an earlier "Kaifiyat" (affidavit) order against Respondent No. 1 and permitted him to file his response in the main case. Key Points: The court found legitimate grounds for delay due to Respondent No. 1's age and medical treatment needs, and granted relief in the interest of natural justice, allowing the case to proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 29/2024 Outcome: The petition (Misc. Application No. 20) filed by petitioner Bharat Haridas Gaikwad was granted. Respondent No. 1 (Popat Pandharinath Gangane) was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs, and the procedural delay in filing the reply was condoned. The court set aside an earlier "Kaifiyat" (affidavit) order against Respondent No. 1 and permitted him to file his response in the main case. Key Points: The court found legitimate grounds for delay due to Respondent No. 1's age and medical treatment needs, and granted relief in the interest of natural justice, allowing the case to proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case