State of Maharashtra vs Sangita Sajjan Pawar — 462/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,354B,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO190027142022
Filing Number
1962/2022
Filing Date
17-12-2022
Registration No
462/2022
Registration Date
17-12-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
Kamti Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sangita Sajjan Pawar
Swapnil Sajjan Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 462/2022 The court acquitted both accused (Sangita Sajjan Pawar and Swapnil Sajjan Pawar) of charges under Sections 324, 354-B, 323, 504, and 506 IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies in witness testimony, improper seizure procedures, lack of specific evidence regarding alleged insults/threats, and credibility issues arising from prior enmity between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 462/2022 The court acquitted both accused (Sangita Sajjan Pawar and Swapnil Sajjan Pawar) of charges under Sections 324, 354-B, 323, 504, and 506 IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies in witness testimony, improper seizure procedures, lack of specific evidence regarding alleged insults/threats, and credibility issues arising from prior enmity between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts