State of Maharashtra vs Sangita Sajjan Pawar — 462/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,354B,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO190027142022

Filing Number

1962/2022

Filing Date

17-Dec-2022

Registration No

462/2022

Registration Date

17-Dec-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mohal

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

Kamti Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,354B,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sangita Sajjan Pawar

  2. 2.Swapnil Sajjan Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 462/2022 The court acquitted both accused (Sangita Sajjan Pawar and Swapnil Sajjan Pawar) of charges under Sections 324, 354-B, 323, 504, and 506 IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies in witness testimony, improper seizure procedures, lack of specific evidence regarding alleged insults/threats, and credibility issues arising from prior enmity between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  11. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  17. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  19. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  20. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  21. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  22. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  23. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  24. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  25. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  26. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  27. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  28. 17-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  29. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  30. 27-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  31. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  32. 11-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  33. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  34. 18-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  35. 15-May-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. JMFC Mohol

  36. 01-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 17-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 462/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 462/2022 The court acquitted both accused (Sangita Sajjan Pawar and Swapnil Sajjan Pawar) of charges under Sections 324, 354-B, 323, 504, and 506 IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies in witness testimony, improper seizure procedures, lack of specific evidence regarding alleged insults/threats, and credibility issues arising from prior enmity between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case